Time for a new thread!
Posted on May 15th, 2008 by Jay Wortman
Let’s start posting on a new thread so everyone doesn’t have to scroll all the way down the old one.
I would also like to inform everyone that there will be periods from time to time during which I won’t be replying to posts. This is because my travels sometimes take me into areas where internet connectivity is not available or difficult. I usually get this caught up fairly quickly when I return.
96 Responses to “Time for a new thread!”
Discussion Area - Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Thank you so much for your work. My mom’s family is just ravaged by diabetes and it looks like I’m on my way to developing it as well (I’m 34, 5′6″ and almost 230 pounds). Wouldn’t you know, we have Native American ancestry, recently enough in our ancestry that we could all register with the tribe we came from.
It gets better. My dad has some Native ancestry on his mom’s side too, but as far as he knew there was no history of diabetes in his family. He was diagnosed in late 2005 and I think he is still in denial about it. Then he learned his younger brother has it too.
My family is also Cajun and diabetes just runs rampant in that community. Unfortunately there is also a lot of poverty in southern Louisiana. A person in poverty who also has diabetes has few choices about what they can eat, and wouldn’t you know it, all the charity food banks down there give their clients things like rice and pasta and beans. It’s got to be exacerbating the health situation.
And you can’t tell the powers that be that this kind of thing is killing people. They’re still telling folks that we get diabetes because we eat too much fat! Right, because diabetes TOTALLY has EVERYTHING to do with fat metabolism. That must be why my insulin spikes when I eat fat, or why I gain weight like crazy when I eat a high-fat, low-carb diet. (In case anyone missed it, that last sentence was sarcasm. Pretend it’s Opposite Day.)
I want to eat low-carb and I would like my daughter to eat ‘relatively’ low-carb, not for weight loss but because she’s three with a terrible family health history and needs to establish good habits–I want her to reach for veggies first as a carb food instead of, say, bread. It’s hard, though. I tell her dad about all this stuff I read about low-carb eating and diabetes and he still brings junk food over.
I think part of the problem is that we still think of our bodies as machines. The success of the calorie hypothesis alone is testimony to that–people actually believe their stomachs are big old bomb calorimeters that incinerate food! What got me interested in low-carb eating in the first place, though, and Atkins in particular, was remembering what I had learned in honors biology in high school about glucose metabolism and protein structures in living things. So I think the lack of a good science background for most Americans is impacting this situation too.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Thanks for your thoughtful comment. Your observation that the reason we are susceptible to misinformation is that most people don’t get sufficient science education is interesting. The problem is worse than you think, though. When you start to look critically at the science that has been used to support the current dietary recommendations you begin to realize that the standards are very poor and that many of the scientists upon whom we have relied for dietary advice appear to have been either incompetent or compromised. You may be interested in Gary Taubes’ excellent book on this topic, “Good Calories, Bad Calories”, in which he meticulously documents how the nutritional science establishment has led us down the wrong path.
I saw from the poster made about the interim analysis of results from the study at Alert Bay that tofu was not allowed during the “induction” phase of the Traditional Diet Program.
1. If I am interested in following this diet, does this mean that I should not be drinking soymilk?
2. What are your thoughts on Edamame (soybeans)?
3. When does the “induction” phase end?
Thank you.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
We didn’t include soya products in the study diet. The amount of carb in things like soymilk and tofu can be significant if you are consuming any quantity. I like edamame but will eat only a few since the beans themselves do contain some carb. In our study we encouraged people to stay on the lower carb “induction” throughout, although, as they lost weight and improved things like cholesterol and blood sugar, we were a little more permissive in our guidance. The problem is that when you have developed insulin resistance, your tolerance for carbs will have become quite low and even small amounts can arrest progress and cause weight loss to stall or to reverse. I personally find that the lower I stay in terms of carbs, the better off I am.
‘White Man’ brought measles and mumps and marijuana from Europe to the Americas along with Coffee and Tea and Milk and Alcohol and Wheat. — He then took the Potato and Corn and Beans and Hybrid them thousands of times until they were also poisons. — Like speed, another one of his poisons, the resulting corn sugar and starch and carbohydrates are pure stimulant poisons that effect our minds and bodies and spirits profoundly. Fruits and vegetables he did the same thing with. — Tobacco he also destroyed. He then took Coca and destroyed that!
He then added his religion to this mix. — As the Eagle Flies is how man should eat, drink and live. — Dr. Jay leads the way!
Hi Dr. Wortman,
Excellent documentary and great website! My question concerns the “one golden shot” that people talk about with regards to low-carb. A few years ago I lost weight quickly and easily on Atkins but, unfortunately, got off track and gained the weight back. I later tried again only to discover that my weight really doesn’t budge past the 5 or so pounds I lose in the first week. Do you have any insight into this or are you aware of any research into this phenomena? Dr. Atkins himself advised people to return from Maintenance to Induction when needed if their weight was creeping up – clearly he didn’t think it was a one shot deal! I believe in the science of low-carb and don’t want to give up, but I need to lose weight and if it’s not going to work for me anymore I don’t know what else to do! Thanks in advance for any and all help.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
There is definitely something to this. I have seen people who, just as you describe, lose weight easily on low-carb, regain the weight by eating carbs again and then struggle and fail on their subsequent attempts to follow a low-carb diet. This is something I have discussed with my very experienced colleagues and I don’t think anyone has a good explanation for why it happens. Dr. Steve Phinney, when he ran a low-carb clinic at UCDavis, would advise people who had fallen off the diet and regained weight that they should wait at least a year before trying low-carb again. In your case it sounds like it has been a few years. Dr. Atkins’ approach was to cut the carbs at the first sign of weight regain and that probably worked. The problem appears to develop when you have put some pounds back on and resumed a high-carb diet for awhile. I am sorry I don’t have more of an answer for you. I would encourage you to keep trying, however, as I think you will eventually succeed even if it is harder to do the second time around.
Addictions will lead us up and down and around and around thousands of rabbit trails, endlessly if that’s what it takes in their quest to get us back to ‘using’ the addictive substance we are addicted too. Again and again if we let them! — We are Addicts! Everyone of us! — Most willing, or we think that we are anyway but it’s just our addictions talking! We think we like them, our bodies say so!
So the ‘golden first time around’ in the world of low carbing is just another ‘rabbit trail’ to divert us! — Rabbit trails are real!
Here’s how it works. — We know alcohol and coffee and tea and tobacco and a lot of drugs are addictive. Everyone of us knows this.
Sugar and corn syrup and hybrid carbohydrates we do NOT know are addictive substances. We know that a day without caffeine is a day without sunshine but we don’t know that caffeine makes us ‘high’ and that is why!
We don’t know that carbohydrates make us ‘high’! — We just like them, we think!
When we go extremely low carb to break this addiction and lower our sugar to cure our diabetes and obesity and the resulting diseases that go with them, we go through ‘drug’ withdrawals and eventually we fall into a slump because we are so ‘used’ to being ‘high’ that we think that it is normal. We think we can’t live without it!
The Inuits were already getting ‘high’ on tea when Dr. Vilhjalmur Stefansson joined them. — Like a duck takes to water is how we are to stimulants like coffee, tea and carbohydrates. — We just walk right in and swim and think it’s normal.
Our thyroids levels drop because they have been so used to being ‘high’ on carbohydrates all there life. — We think we are supposed to be high and now we think we are depressed and our thyroid level shows this to be both real and true. — The thyroid is actually going back to where it would normally have been had we not become carbohydrate addicts when we were just babies. If we just hold our course we will feel really good again! — It’s really hard to do though!
This ’stall’ with the weight loss is a prime example of all of this.
I am just a ‘laymen’ and all this only works within the sugar and carbohydrates are ’stimulant addictions’, hypothesis, and the we are getting ‘high’ hypothesis, that I live by.
Jimmy Moore is going through this right now and so am I!
Jimmy was down to almost under 200# and is now up to 265#. I was down to 282# and am now back up to 320# so all of this is being worked on intently right now as we speak.
I know what my problem is and I believe it is Jimmy’s problem too. — It’s called a sugar or carbohydrate addiction and addictions in general.
I will solve mine and eventually Jimmy will too. — We are dedicated. Jimmy uses exercised off weight loss as well as low carb. I use low carb only.
He believes in his and I believe in mine. — Both of ours work if we don’t ‘fall off the wagon’!
People stay on speed because of the endless depression and upset if they DON’T! — It’s a tough fight and it takes a long time!
To be normal and healthy again is worth it’s weight in gold! — That’s healthy, mind, body and spirit!
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Jimmy tells me that he was down to 215 at one point but that his weight has crept up recently.
Dr. Jay,
I think I may have similar problems as scotiagirl.
I have been strictly following the low carb diet since march 19th after seeing your doc.
I have also read Good Calories Bad Calories and other articles by Gary Taubes and am absolutely convinced that low carbs is the healthy way to eat.
I quickly lost 8-10 lbs. and about 2 inches around my waist.
I was thrilled as I was able to fit into pants that I had not been able to do up the week before.
Altho’ I have been diligent about my carb intake I have not been able to lose another ounce. In fact this week I was up about 3 lbs.
8 years ago I lost 50lbs on the Zone diet and kept it off for 2 years. I then retired and drastically changed my routine and eating habits and had gained most of it back.
I am 58, 5′7″, 185lb. and still premenopausal. I am wearing a size 16.
Diabetes and heart disease run in my family tho’ I have never had cholesteral problems but had gestational diabetes with my first pregnancy.
Other than my weight I consider myself very healthy..I never seem to be ill.
Currently my low carb eating looks like this….
Breakfast— 2-3 cups of decaf with whipping cream in the mornings, 2 eggs fried in butter with either old cheddar or canadian bacon and spinach.
Lunch—salmon or tuna with Hellmans, celery, red pepper and onion with salad greens OR greens with 1/2 avacado and bacon and an egg with oil, mayo and vinegar dressing or a beef patty bbq’d or fried with butter with old cheddar and mayo and dijon with some mushrooms and onions or a green salad.
Dinner–steak, pork, fish with your faux potatoes or creamed cabbage (cabbage whipping cream and butter), broccoli, asparagus, brussels sprouts.
I am never hungry and rarely snack, maybe a handful of almonds 3X a week or celery with peanut butter (I think I have had that 2X since march)
I have indulged in the odd scotch and soda and a couple of glasses of white wine with dinner about once a week.
I did not have any withdrawl symptoms when I started this.
I have been telling everyone about this way of eating but of course they think I am nuts and of course they do not see me losing any weight.
My response is only that I am able to eat all this fat and have not gained a ton of weight in two months.
I am going to the Dr. next week…what should he check for besides the usual cholesterol and blood sugar levels? I do have my thyroid checked as my mom had thyroid problems. Is there anything more specific?
Sorry this is so long but I am perplexed and disappointed that I have not lost the weight I thought I would have.
Than you for your thoughts…
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
It sounds like you are eating the right kinds of food. As I said in an earlier post, there are some things to look for and thyroid is one of them. Your doctor should check your TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone). You should also ask for a C-reactive protein. There are a myriad of benefits from eating this way beyond just weight loss. One that is clearly emerging in the research is that this diet is anti-inflammatory. Your C-reactive protein and your white blood cell count, both indicators of the level of inflammation in your system, should both drop down to the low end of the normal range. This is a good thing as we know that inflammation is at the root of chronic diseases including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, etc etc. A study by Cassandra Forsythe et al, published in Lipids last year, showed that a battery of inflammatory markers dropped significantly on low-carb vs low-fat. There was also a big improvement in quality of the LDL (bad cholesterol) sub-particles. Your lipid profile should show a drop in triglycerides and possibly a rise in your HDL (good cholesterol). Your doc may be alarmed to see a small rise in your LDL (or not). If this is the case, although we don’t routinely test the LDL sub-particles, you should take comfort in knowing that a low-carb diet like yours will shift the LDL away from the atherogenic type towards the healthy type. Don’t let an increase in LDL scare you if you see a drop in triglycerides and a rise in HDL. Probably the biggest benefit in following a low-carb diet can be found in the reduction in oxidative stress (AKA free radical production) that occurs at the cellular level when you stop burning glucose and shift to ketones and fat. A recent study by Jarrett et al that will be coming out in the Journal of Neurochemistry showed that the way a low-carb diet reliably cures childhood epilepsy was through this mechanism in brain cells. They talk about the importance of this finding in other neurological diseases like ALS and MS, however, I think this will also turn out to be important throughout the body as this effect would be seen in all the cells, not just in the neurons. My friend, Dr. Steve Phinney, has been doing some interesting work with Dr. Craig Warden at UCDavis which is demonstrating in mice other benefits of a low-carb diet at the cellular level. All this to say, even though it is frustrating to find that weight loss is not happening as much as you’d like, there are lots of good reasons to stay the course. I think you can significantly improve your metabolic health even when your weight remains high. And, I think you will eventually find your weight will drop, too.
The Absolute Zero Drug or The Absolute Zero Carb Diet or ‘The Absolute Traditional Indigenous Peoples Diet’ like Dr. Jay Wortman of Canada is trying.
Call it what you want but what I’m looking for is a few people to try this diet with me.
It is Genuinely Drug Free and Sugar Free. — Zero Alcohol. Zero Tobacco. Zero Caffeine. Zero Pharmaceuticals. Zero Thyroid medicine. Zero Vitamines and Zero Supplements and Zero artificial sweeteners.
There is no forced exercise.
If this sounds crazy just think about all of the species including man for millions and millions of years and what they ate and drank and ingested and what they still eat and drink and ingest with the exception of modern man.
There will be no marijuana or cocaine or speed or any other drug in this test.
Zero anything, except for water to drink and meat and eggs and a few extremely low carb vegetables to eat and wild rice and very occasional wild berries and wild fruit. — So that makes it not genuinely zero carb but it does make it very nearly so and it does make it The Absolute Indigenous Traditional Peoples Diet that the entire world knew and lived with in perfect health for tens of thousands or millions of years. They lived to be old and in perfect mental and psychical health for there entire life. — Sound mind and sound body and spiritually perfect in every way. — They raised there young the same way. — Infant mortality was nearly zero.
This is a northern North American diet! — But you can live anywhere. — There will be lots of fish and seafood and wild animals and wild birds and wild vegetables and wild fruits and wild seeds whenever possible.
Unfortunately domesticated and farm raised game and vegetables will also be a mainstay in this diet for many of us.
This is a calling for a few people that would like to try this diet with me.
They can be fat or skinny or a little bit fat or enormously fat and any size, weight or gender. Young or old.
No children please because this could be dangerous to our health because of all the damage done to our health by our current eating and drinking and ingesting all of these foods and drinks and drugs for all of these years. Most of us since shortly or immediately as soon as we were born began poisoning ourselves.
We will simply eat and drink and breathe what we were intended to eat and drink and breathe like all of the other species.
This diet will include lots of sunshine as well as night air. Night and day but mostly day.
I’m hoping to get one or two takers to join me on this diet. — We will be making history!
What ever I missed can be added or changed or deleted later.
Thank You
Tom Bunnell
Just for the record here — I am the only guy on the planet earth that has figured out how and why the white race massacred and brutally took over of the whole world except for China! — I am white.– I think only a white man could have figured all this out and brought it forward.
The Kings and Queens first captured and hybrid sugar and carbohydrates and starch.
I don’t think they even knew that these were stimulants like the newer stimulants called speed or amphetamines or cocaine or methamphetamine. — They thought they really were that great and gods gift to the earth and everybody else heathen. — They didn’t know it was the drug high like adrenaline that made them feel and think they were superior and therefore it was right to slaughter whole villages and nations. — The Vikings were equal monsters and for the same reason.
This diet proves this!
Hi AndreaK,
I’m reposting my response to you here in case you missed it in the other giant thread. I also realize I left out two other possible helps — iodine & maitake mushrooms. I don’t know where you live, but many in the US are iodine deficient. Not only is our soil iodine-poor — but many many pollutants and chemicals that are so pervasive in our food and environment displace or block the iodine in our bodies. I do not advocate trying iodine supplements without medical supervision, but you could try incorporating small amounts of sea vegetables into your diet. The brown seaweeds — kombu and wakame especially can have a beneficial effect on metabolism. Wakame is absolutely delicious and the taste is reminiscent of spinach noodles. You can buy it pre-cut so all you do is give it a quick soak (it quickly expands and absorbs the water) and toss in a salad or scramble with eggs or add to shrimp/seafood salad or simply as a tasty side-dish. Roll your scrambled eggs in nori sheets. Snack on a few pieces of red dulse straight from the bag. A little seaweed may help your metabolism. Do not suddenly add large amounts — just small amounts daily or every other day. It’s worth a try and can add variety to the usual low-carb vegetables.
Maitake mushrooms are wonderful diet additions. Buy them dried and snack on a few right from the bag or reconstitute and be sure to drink the soak water or use it as a soup base. Maitake seems to have a beneficial effect on blood glucose and metabolism. Supplements made from maitake are used to enhance the immune system but I like to simply eat the mushrooms. Try adding them a few times a week. You can also buy them fresh depending upon where you live. The dried make a nice crunch snack though.
Here are some other thoughts on your weight stall from my prior posting. You may have developed a sensitivity to dairy products which could cause you to retain water, masking further weight loss. I am not saying you have a classic dairy allergy, but perhaps just a sensitivity to it. I know I do and I grew up eating dairy but discovered it caused me to plateau despite eating very low carbs. It was difficult for me to believe this but I reluctantly tried omitting all dairy and the scale quickly resumed a downward trend. This was not merely the result of cutting calories because I purposely added calories to make up for the lost dairy calories. Try cutting out all dairy products or at least all dairy except for butter if you must have it. Best to go cold turkey and cut them all out though. Try this for 7 days and see if the scale number drops. Also, I find I can get away with unpasteurized sheep cheese but quickly bloat with cow dairy products. So experiment if you feel you need to eat dairy but you may feel much better without it. Nothing ventured nothing gained.
Since saturated fat is vital for health and metabolism — replace butter with organic virgin coconut oil. It contains naturally occurring MCT (med. chain triglycerides) and many — including myself — have found it absolutely kickstarts weight loss. It is delicious as a dressing or for curries etc. There are several brands available — I like the one from Tropical Traditions.
Also, while calories don’t count as much on low carb, they still count to some degree — especially for women. As you lower your weight, you should try slightly cutting calories. I do not mean go low calorie or slavishly count every calorie. I just mean to slightly, ever so slightly, reduce portions. For example, I used to eat 3 egg omelets with 3 turkey sausage links for a typical breakfast. Then I realized that I was just as satiated with 2 egg omelets and/or 2 turkey sausage links. I had just eaten more out of habit. Make sure you aren’t eating unlimited amounts simply because meat has practically zero carbs. Also, I grew up eating huge American size meat portions ie 12oz or more per serving and I am a short female! Now I realize that I can be just as satiated on 4-5 oz per meal so long as the cuts are sufficiently fatty.
Try incorporating unsweetened, organic oolong tea into your regime. Green tea — organic sencha — unsweetened is also good. Add a little cinnamon and powdered ginger but no sweetener. Use cayenne in your seasoning.
Do not use any artificial sweeteners — you may have a sensitivity to them.
Thyroid problems are endemic, especially amongst we gals and especially amongst us gals who are middle-aged plus. So definitely find a competent doc to check out your thyroid. I highly recommend 2 books on this topic: the classic by Broda Barnes MD “Hypothyroidism: The Unsuspected Illness” plus a new classic by the Dr. Mark Starr MD “Type 2 Hypothyroidism”.
Realize that food sensitivities are common and often go undiagnosed. That is why you need to omit certain common food allergens one by one and see if your weight begins to drop. Common culprits: nuts, eggs, dairy products, wine. I know these are low-carb staples but for some reason, they can cause stalls and are common allergens. Don’t waste money ofn dubious allergy tests or expensive close-minded allergists who only believe in the notoriously unreliable skin scratch testing — simply omit certain foods for 7 days and see how you feel. You know your body best. You can develop a sensitivity to anything you ingest or perhaps the molds (cheese and peanut butter for example are naturally moldy foods) which is causing water retention or affecting your metabolism.
Finally, walk for an hour a day — preferably first thing in the morning BEFORE breakfast. If one hour is too long, then start with 30 minutes. Up and at em for 15 minutes at a brisk clip then turn around and come home — reward yourself with a nice low-carb breakfast.
I’m sorry to be so longwinded and I hope what I’ve written can be useful to you. Best of luck and if you take it one day at a time and try not to get discouraged, I know you will succeed. Don’t let small setbacks throw you off course. Persistence is the horse that wins.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Thank you for your suggestions. It will be interesting to see if Andrea gets the results that have so far eluded her.
AndreaK –
I just took a look at Dr. Michael Eades’ low-carb blog and today’s topic is about those who are struggling to lose despite keeping carbs very low. You may find something helpful for your situation in his posting.
http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/weight-loss/low-carb-and-calories-2/#more-1243
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Dr. Eades offers some good advice on this topic. Thanks for the link. In general, I think his is one of the better blogs on low-carb out there.
Thanks Teagal .
I live in Nova Scotia…lots of seaweed here!
I looked at Micheal Eades blog. Thanks for the link.
It makes sense.
I will try the dairy first.
I do eat cheese and of course the whipping cream in my decaf coffee!
So it’s tea for me and no dairy or nuts.
I’m in for a big test…am off to New Mexico this week…10 days of mexican food! tortillas and cheese!!!
Will report when I return.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Lots of carb in those tortillas! Let us know how it all works out.
My newest reciepe discovery!
Food that we love and look forward to eating is probably the most important facet of this diet! — Food and drinks that don’t taste great and are to small of amounts are the biggest challenge we face. — We will sabotage our diet to get away from tasteless and not satisfying food and drink if we are not careful! The same with to small of amounts! — Don’t forget that we are drug addicts and our drug is hybrid and processed and refined carbohydrates and starch and sugar and flour.(all of them).
My new diet discovery is a milestone discovery for me and I think many of you will benefit from my discovery!
First I will tell you about my emergency food! — Yesterday I was on my way to Fargo, North Dakota (about 50 miles away). — I hadn’t eaten and it was raining and I have to wait an hour or more after I get up to eat because I have to take my Thyroid Pill (Levothyroxine 100 MCG once a day) for my radiation treated thyroid gland, on an empty stomach and then wait at least an hour before I eat.(no problem usually)
I was on the way and had just left the house and gotten to town three miles away on my way to Fargo this day and I was planning on eating at the all you can eat steak buffet in Fargo so I didn’t bring any food with me. — I got a call from my daughter wanting to know if I would watch the kids while she went to a few appointments in town.(Detroit Lakes, Minnesota) Our small town of 6500 that grows to twice or triple that with tourism from all over. A lot from Canada.(We have what they call WE Fest, a country music festival that brings in 100,000 people every August for about a week. — Twenty miles north on the White Earth Indian Reservation there is a Pow Wow every June 14 for three days celebrating the first day of there arrival on there new Reservation just after the Civil War! They also have a large Casino and convention center! — We have a lot of action around here but mostly it’s just peaceful small town life. We are a part of all this bussell though!
So yes, I wanted the kids! I always want the kids. No problem. Three girls 10 and 7 and 6 — Babo(Casey), Areanna and Hannah.
It turns out they hadn’t eaten because they had just gotten up and there mother was in a hurry. It was close to eleven o’clock by now so we (the kids and I) were considering McDonald’s or the Chinese Buffet. Three dollars each at the Chinese Buffet won out so we went there. — Nine Dollars plus tax for all three($2.99 each no adult required! Amazing! — There mother paid and a good time was had by all.
The kids are not on my diet but I do restrict them from what they eat and drink a lot. — Like no pop or juice or milk or ice cream or potatoes or fryed bread or corn etc etc. They still eat a lot of carbohydrates that they shouldn’t but nobody believes me and I can’t do anything about it. I don’t force the issue! Nobody wants to hear it or do it.
I don’t eat when we go to McDonald’s or the Chinese Buffet or most anywhere we eat out. It saves money and my diet will only allow to eat meat and eggs and only a few vegetables so unless I go somewhere where I want to spend the money I just bring my food and water with me and eat in the car or at a park or something. I always carry pickles and water with me.
After eating we went to the park to play on the swings for awhile and I still hadn’t eaten which was OK because I no longer get sick if I don’t eat after getting off from the carbohydrates but I was pretty sure this was going to go on for several hours or more and sometimes swimming so I wanted to eat something anyway.
So I fell back on my emergency food plan for when I’m away from home and have nothing and need to eat. — I went to the grocery store and bought a pound of baloney for $2 on sale. — I only buy the one carb per serving variety and that was what was on sale.(Oscar Meyer chicken and pork and meat bologna). Sixteen serving per container. 16 Ounces. — I ate it all! — Problem solved!
We had a great day and later that evening about seven o’clock I came home and although I don’t usually like to eat after six in the evening, I do usually like to eat my second meal.(just because I can) — Three meals would be to many!
I had my 3/4 of a pound of bacon thawed and had bought a dozen eggs and could have cooked and eaten them and they are always good but fishing and eating fish was on my mind, which it often is but I have had this problem with the way to cook fish on my low carb diet! — My whole life I would flour my fish with common white bleached flour and with some salt and pepper and maybe some garlic powder and then fry them to a golden brown in Lard or Crisco. — I can build a bone pile about a foot high eating fish this way! I love it!
No flour, no more! — Pure Sugar! Worse than sugar!
So I have been going without fish forever and suffering for it!
So this evening I decided it was time to fish! I had just bought while I was in town after I dropped the kids off a fishing pole at the Pawn Shop. He wanted $15 and I got it for $12 no tax! — A Mitchell 300 open face spinning reel from the 1950’s, it’s black and in mint condition and on a six foot graphite rod that is a good one and with a steel leader and a hook and bobber, ready to fish! — $12 Bucks!
I have six of these reels now I love them.
So I went fishing, not knowing how I was going to cook them. — I was thinking about boiling them which can be really good but I’m not set up the best for boiling right now. I mostly fry in my square electric frying pan. It works great and I could boil in it but I wanted to fry the fish without flour, although OK it wasn’t very appealing to me. I had tried it several times and the fish were just barley eatable. Pretty bland. OK if you were starving but not very appealing.
It was seven thirty in the evening and I brought a shovel along to the lake and dug some worms that I knew from before would be there because it had been raining a lot for the last several days. I got about twenty of them pretty easily.
(This all took place last night!)
A couple of kids were on the dock that I see there pretty often when we go swimming. They were catching sunfish and bass and that’s what I was after. Mostly sunfish! I love them!
The kids started giving me there fish and I caught a few and then then the kid caught a pretty nice bass, about a pound and a half, the sunnies were about a half a pound, a little small but great eating. the kid had caught a smaller bass and now I had the two bass and about ten sunfish which was about as much as I would eat so I stopped fishing and headed home. — I had brought a spoon and knife with me to clean the fish at the lake so I wouldn’t have the smell and mess at home but had left the butcher knife at home so I just went home, knowing I would just get the knife and go to the other lake across the road from my house and clean the fish. — It took about twenty minutes to catch those fish. The kid had timed us and told me as I left. We were all pretty pleased. An old man had come by and fished for a bit while this was all going on. He told me where everybody was catching fish and I thanked him, he was a pretty congenial guy and we had enjoyed talking. The kids were having fun!
So I got the knife and went across from my house and cleaned my fish at that public access in the grass and threw the guts and heads and fins and scales back in the lake and had fresh clean fish. — After I got home I washed them again in fresh water and they were ready to cook. — Gorgeous-beautiful!
My electric frying pan was a small bit oily from the hamburger I had fried the night before but not nearly enough! — It hit me to fry my bacon I had thawed and then the fish and then it hit me to just put the three quarters of a pound of bacon that was bacon chunks and pieces and pretty fat in the pan and spread them out like I always do and then dump the fish on top of them. The fish were not fillets although those would have worked even better but these fish were scaled with the heads and tails and fins cut off. My favorite way. With the skin on and the bones in.
So I did it. I set the frying pan on low to where you could just hear it frying some and put the fish in with the bacon and then salt and peppered and garlic powdered them and began cooking all this at the same time. — I went to my computer and looked at the clock.
I know this pan and the heat setting I was on and I knew it was cooking slow but would still brown. — I was about twenty feet away and at my computer. After awhile I could smell and hear them a little bit. — I let them go for about fifteen minutes. I knew the pan wouldn’t burn them at that setting.
The fish were stuck but cooking nicely and the bacon was browning well and everything looked and smelled great. I thought I was on to something. — I turned everything over and unstuck the fish the best I could but there was a lot of stick but that was OK. — Everything was turned and I lightly salt and peppered and garlic powdered the other side. The grease had been making a lot of grease but the fish were sucking it up pretty good. I was on my way to hog heaven!
I went back to my computer and fifteen minutes later when I knew they were done(the bass was pretty fat so I went a little longer than I normally would have) I got up and went to get them. — They were beautiful and smelled great.
I had my platter ready but knew that with all that sticking I would have a mess if I tried to remove them from the pan and put them on my platter so I decided to eat them from the pan.
I unplugged the cord and carried the frying pan with the cooked fish and bacon and grabbed a cloth bath towel and some paper towels and headed to my couch where I sit at my computer and my jug of fresh drinking water. — It was pure bliss! I’ve never had a better meal in my life. I ate them with my fingers and went to hog heaven. My fish are back!
I can buy ocean fish and catch fresh fish for the rest of my life! I now know how to cook them and so do you! I love it!
Thank You!
-Tom
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Sounds like fishing heaven there! The recipe sounds delicious, too.
Hey Doc! — Have I got a prize for you! — I found it after looking about everywhere in my house! — I had remembered seeing it awhile back and I knew I still had it. I had loaned it out one time with an insistence that I get it back. I want you to keep it! It was given to me by I don’t remember who a long time ago regarding Indian health and the person asked me if I wanted it and I said yes. I knew at the time that it was important and it was. She had several of them and was happy for me to have one — It’s a VHS tape called REZROBICS — you’ve probably seen it or maybe not. — It’s a tape made by some Sioux Nation people in North Dakota or Ojibwas, I think it is. — They have several first nations peoples lives they are following regarding diabetes and some wondrously warm and genuine people in it and also some great native american humor. This one guy is great!
I would like to send it to you for you to keep if you don’t have it or haven’t seen it. I think you will really like it.
I got to thinking about it when I heard about your BFD Documentary DVD and somebody said the humor in it was wonderful! Right away I remembered this tape and knowing a lot of native people I knew what he was talking about. — I sat with a native lady grandma last night at a little league baseball game our mutual grandson was playing in. The little ones, they are so much fun to watch, we just chuckled and laughed all the way through it! We had a great time!
Anyway I got this tape, I hope you take it! — If you will email me your address I will mail it to you!
Here it is, I Googled and found it! — You no doubt have it but if you don’t I would still like to mail you mine!
http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000696.php
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I appreciate your generous offer but I don’t have a VHS player anymore, just DVD and TiVo.
The low-carb approach has certainly resulted reduction of stored fat for me. I have gone from about 15% body fat down to about 7% body fat. I do work out for 30 minutes 2-3 times per week, but I have been doing that all along.
Concerning blood lipids, consistent with Dr. Jay’s comments, after going to a very low-carb diet (no grain, starchy vegetables or high glycemic fruits) my HDL went up, my triglycerides are below normal range, my c-reactive is at the bottom of normal, my VLDL is at the bottom of normal and my apoprotein levels are at the bottom of normal range. My LDL, however, did go up, giving me total cholesterol of 5.26. In the three previous years I hade been 3.6, 3.2 and 3.9 total. I only had the HDL, non-HDL breakdown for those years. My total to HDL ratio was at about 2.7 for 3 years and was 3.1 this year.
The 5.26 figure causes me to pause, but presumably this is okay if it is HDL and LDL that increase the toal and VLDL is rock bottom. Am I worng on this, or should I be more concerned about the LDL level?
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I was in Egypt for a few days, hence the delay in replying to recent posts.
I would not be concerned with the small rise in LDL. This can happen on low-carb and there is some debate as to why. It may be due to the release of stored fat during the time you are losing weight. My colleagues report that if there is a rise, it is often a transient one. We also know from the recent work of Forsythe, et al that the quality of your LDL will be greatly improved on low-carb. The shift towards healthy LDL would outweigh any perceived problem with an over-all rise in the LDL number. If your TAG is down, HDL is up and your ratio is within the normal range, I would view that as a good result and one that is typical of this diet. Ditto for the reduced CRP. Total cholesterol is basically useless as a predictor of cardiovascular risk. This has been known since early Framingham. In fact, in that study there was a striking correlation between low cholesterol and increased cancer which implies that a higher total cholesterol may be healthier (presumably if the ratio is okay).
Dr. Jay
Thanks — I see it’s available on DVD at the above link for free plus shipping for Native Americans everywhere and they encourage everybody to then copy it and spread it all around. — They are trying to cure the diabetes epidemic!
I think they are Nez Pierce.
Your piece of the pie is what they have needed!
I appreciate your allowing me to post now and then, I will honor that and not overdo it!
Thank You
Tom
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
No worries – all opinions are welcome here.
Dr. Jay
I’m doing your diet to the letter and it is working perfectly!
Your reinforcement was very much needed. I was close! — The Traditional Diet took it over the top!
Thank You
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I’m glad to hear it’s working for you. Let us know how it goes.
Dr. Jay
I’m going to tell you what feels better than all of this!
It’s not being ‘high’ and ’stimulated’ unnaturally on sugar! — No sugar, no artificial sweeteners, no fruit, no milk, no caffeine, no alcohol, no tobacco, no stimulants of any kind. — Nothing but water, meat and eggs and a few very low carb vegetables!
How many people in America can say this, or for that matter, how many people in the world can say this!
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Wholesome, whole foods – you can’t go wrong with that!
Dr. Jay
Your like a beacon in the night where few ships are currently sailing. — Your steadily and persistently doing your job without complaint! — Eventually this ocean of ‘traditional health’ is going to ring through and these waters will be flooded and filled with millions upon millions of people, seeking to regain there health.
Trusting your studies are progressing nicely.
Thank You
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Thanks for the kudos.
-Tom Bunnell
I just returned from a two-week trip in Italy that was essentially a dine-around tour. Checked out all the best cheese shops I could find, savouring the local fresh cheeses in particular. We ate out every night–three course meals. Having stuffed my gullet most nights, I walked after dinner and on getting up inthe morning, and of course we walked around ruins, museums and streetscapes much of the day. Of course I avoided grains, starchy vegetables and desserts (well, just a spoonful here and there). For dessert I would have cheese, or in Venice–sardines in sauerkraut, which were somewhat sweet. Ate all the vegetable side dishes I could get–it is hard to get lots of vegetables dining out every meal.
When I returned home I cringed getting on the scale. I was so shocked at the result I had to use a second scale–I had dropped six pounds to my lowest weight since I was 15 or 16 years old (over 30 years ago).
Eat wisely and you can feast your way around Italy for two weeks eating the best cheeses, meats, seafood and vegetables. It was sheer culinary delight. And quite frankly, I prefered the fresh local peccorino cheeses over the small tastes of dessert I had anyway.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Sounds lovely. We used to vacation in Italy prior to the arrival of our son. Our last visit there was when he was two and just prior to my discovering that I had type 2 diabetes. We used to eat the risottos, pastas and focaccia breads back then. No more! It’s good to hear from your experience that it is possible to enjoy a low-carb culinary experience there. Makes me want to get back there again!
Dr. Wortman could you please refer me to reading material or studies that show what was claimed in your documentary that all the nutrients that we think we need to eat from fruits and vegetables are in saturated fat. I surmised this long ago when I read about Viljalmur Steffanson’s experience eating Inuit food and how he kept scurvy at bay by eating blubber, ate almost entirely a wide variety of protein and ate zero carbohydrates. But the statement in your documentary is the first time I have had it corroborated. I would like to read more about this specifically.
Could you also tell me if they people in Alert Bay who stayed on the diet became ketotic?
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Steffanson, in the famous Bellevue experiment, showed that if you ate only protein and fat, your requirement for a lot of the vitamins drops. This explained why the Inuit, who had very little vitamin C in their diet of fat and protein, did not die of scurvy. Although I believe this is true, in our study we hedged our bets by supplying a mulit-vitamin to participants. In reality, I don’t think many of them actually took their vitamins and everyone appeared to do just fine.
Yes, they became ketotic which is a normal condition when you don’t eat enough carbohydrates to supply the brain with glucose. The brain switches to burning ketones which are produced by the liver from fat. There is no harm in this “physiological ketosis”, not to be confused with the dangerous ketoacidosis that can occur in type 1 diabetics when they don’t take insulin.
Hi everybody,
this is a comment on the inablility to lose weight the second time round. Just a few suggestions: age plays a role, the older you are, the longer it takes to lose weight (as I know from experience). Sluggish thyroid maybe? Happens more often than one thinks. Do you eat soy foods? Don’t. They act as a suppressive to thyroid function and with their content of plant hormones can play havoc with your body’s hormones. Do yourself a favour and stay away from soy foods. Don’t fall for the myth of the soy-loving Asians. They will eat the occasional morsel of tofu and use soy sauce as a condiment but that’s it. No sane Asian person would ever dream of consuming soy milk or – horror of horrors – soy yoghurt.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
It is true that we drop our metabolic rate as we age and that this can contribute to weight gain. Another interesting thing I have discovered is that while, we are eating a high carb diet, our thyroid production runs high and that it drops when we go on a low-carb diet. This may explain why some people plateau early in their weight loss. It also fits with my theory that, when we eat carbs, our body burns them preferentially, not because it likes them but because it is desperate to get rid of them. Ramping up metabolism with extra thyroid hormone would help to increase the burn rate. Perhaps this is why we see so much hypothyroidism as the thyroid gets stressed from running in overdrive in response to a high-carb intake. Speculation on my part but I think it all hangs together.
Interesting perspective on soy. I like a little fried tofu with seafood stuffing when I am indulging in dim sum which is rare these days. Otherwise I tend to avoid soy products.
best wishes
Dr. Jay,
I have a lingering question about coronary plaque buildup. I read a lot of commentary claiming that high levels of fat in the blood cause it to stick to vessel linings, causing narrowing of the arteries. Other commentary suggests that, no, it is a body response to inflammation in the arterial lining. Presumably cholesterol, which is a constructive material for cells, binds to the vessel lining to cement over inflammatory damage. If so, it is not the fat in the blood, unless the fat itself causes the inflammation. That seems unlikely although I read many claims correlating saturated fat intake to inflammation. I would have thought saturated fat would be fairly inert in the blood.
To me it seems more plausible that excessive blood sugar causes cross-linking or oxidative damage to vessel lining, which results in inflammation which results in plaque buildup, to seal the damage so to speak. (Why would lower levels of blood sugar be okay, as opposed to all levels). Trying to lower cholesterol, then, is treating a body response to the problem without treating the problem. On the other hand, if the damage is there and starving the system of capacity to produce or deliver cholesterol reduces the buildup of plaque, then I suppose it is better than doing nothing.
I have yet to see reference to conclusive research on any of this. Specifically, I have yet to see convincing evidence that LDL cholesterol (undifferentiated) causes arterial disease. Am I missing something?
By the way, when do you expect the results from Phinney’s research on fat metabolism in cells that you mentioned earlier?
Cheers
Murray Braithwaite
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Good questions, as usual! While it is easy to visualize fat clogging our arteries the way bacon grease will clog the kitchen drain, it actually is much more complicated than that. I subscribe to the theory that inflammation is at the root of the problem. Something causes inflammation of the arterial wall and in the ensuing physiological process, cholesterol is deposited there. It appears that certain kinds are more likely to be involved, hence the athrogenicity of small, dense LDL. I have seen explanations that propose that damaged cells cause the endothelium to become leaky and that the small particles can get in while the larger ones cannot. I don’t know if this is the true mechanism but it seems to hang together. Then the question becomes what causes the inflammation? Well, we know, for instance, that the toxins that flow through your blood when you smoke cigarettes can do this. In the case of diet, we know that some types of food promote inflammation, fructose, for instance and the high omega-6 vegetable oils. It also appears that a high-carb diet is pro-inflammatory in general, probably from the oxidative stress of burning all that glucose. Cassandra Forsythe et al published a study in Lipids a few months ago where a low-carb diet went head-to-head with a low-fat diet and all the inflammatory markers dropped dramatically on low-carb.
Steve Phinney and Craig Warden are doing work at UCDavis that should shed some light on the fundamental cellular mechanisms at play when you eat carbs vs fats. I think it’s going to upset a lot of people when it gets published but I don’t know when that will be at this point.
Dr Jay,
I understand that you can’t/shouldn’t give medical advice over the net, so I won’t ask. However, I do have a question about a condition from which I have suffered for a long time which doctors have been fairly unresponsive on.
Starting about 10-15 years ago, I noticed that I got hungry quickly after eating refined carbs or sugary foods. This developed into getting shaky/anxious after eating these foods. I eventually made the connection with my eating and my symptoms. After I got to about 100 lbs overweight, I went to my doctor and she said I should see an endocrinologist. When I went to the endocrinologist, he suggested that “you should eat a few less carbs”. I asked him if a low-carb diet would be appropriate and he indicated that was an option, but that I would probably find it too restrictive. That week I started the Atkins diet and within no time I dropped 50+ lbs. The next 15 pounds came off painfully slow with significant calorie restriction. The lowest I ever got was 215 lbs which was still about 30+ pounds overweight.
Initially when I began low-carb I found that symptoms improved substantially but I later found that they were not gone for good even if I avoided high-carb foods. I found that artificial sweeteners caused the same issues as well and decided to start avoiding those. I thought I would have the problem licked and then found that a breakfast of lean protein and some low-carb veggies caused the same symptoms. I decided to ramp up the amount of fat in my diet and to not overconsume protein and nearly completely avoid veggies except in the evening when I eat very small portions of low-carb veggies. Things have improved a bit, but I still frequently get the “low blood sugar” symptoms I have had in the past, shakiness, anxiousness, cold sweats.
Despite all the times that I experience these symptoms, it is inconsistent. Sometimes I can go 5 – 8 hours without eating, other times I develop symptoms within minutes of eating. To mitigate the symptoms, I have learned to eat my meals very slowly with most of them lasting at least a half hour. This seems to help some. I also keep high protein/high fat snacks handy whenever I get hungry.
Sorry if I have gone on and on, but this is really driving me insane now and I am looking for anyone to help me understand what’s going on. I recently began pursuing this with my new doctor and her initial advice was eat 6-7 times a day and eat “a little bit of everything” such as granola bars etc. I will humor her in terms of eating with greater frequency (as my appetite demands) but I will not eat grain/sugar based foods.
Any thoughts or advice? I used to think this was just plain old reactive hypoglycemia, but since the symptoms don’t seem to diminish with the absence of carbohydrates, I suspect there is something more going on.
If you have any advice on working with my doc, that would be great too.
Thanks for any advice or insight you can offer and thanks for the “My Big Fat Diet” documentary. I got the DVD for my birthday and I really enjoyed it.
Alexander
Dr. Jay’ Reply:
Your problem does sound like reactive hypoglycemia but is puzzling since you continue to have the problem even when eating a very low-carb diet. It may be due to the protein in your diet. Your body does have an insulin response to protein although, as you would expect, it is much lower than the response to refined carbs. I would speculate that in your case the protein may be triggering the hyperinsulinemia that causes your blood sugar to fall. You do need to eat protein and if you don’t eat enough you risk muscle-wasting or, worse, kwashiorkor, a protein deficiency disease. You may want to try experimenting with adding fattier foods and cutting back a little on the protein content. Have a look at this article on the insulin response to various food types: http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/66/5/1264
You will find that most people recommend about 0.8 g/kg/d as a reasonable intake for protein. This will vary a little depending on things like your age and how much exercise you are doing (also pregnancy and lactation which, I assume, are not applicable in your case). On a low-carb diet, your liver will be converting protein to carbohydrate through a process called gluconeogenesis. For this reason, you should probably aim for a slightly higher protein intake when doing low-carb. On the other hand, you probably shouldn’t exceed 1.5 g/kg/d unless you are into bodybuilding. I suggest you do some googling around to learn more about this and how much protein various foods contain. Most of us eat more than our daily requirement of protein so I am guessing that you will be able to reduce your intake while still eating enough to meet your daily needs.
Hello Dr. Jay. I’ve been scanning the letters to see if I’m not being redundant in my comment. I was surprised that I didn’t see any mention of Stevia leaf when sugar alternatives were discussed. Not only is Stevia extremely sweet, but it is diabetic friendly and also very alkaline to help balance systemic pH. I use the loose powder form and just the tiniest pinch by gently tapping the container is all you need to sweeten tea or coffee. It is more expensive but the bottle will seem magical because it never seems to run out! Stevia was a great way for me to wean off the desire for a sweet to top off supper when I was in the induction phase of my high fat diet change. A cup of sweet tea hit the spot for a week or two while my desire for sweets declined.
Now this is probably redundant. My female friend has not responded so well yet to the high fat diet and hasn’t lost any weight yet after several weeks. She is 47, 140lbs and about 5′6″ Her torso is very lean but her thighs and bottom are not quite so. Is it common for women to be slower to respond to the diet changes? I urge her to be vigilant but perhaps you can you offer any comforting words? Perhaps women, because they are more hormonally complex than men take longer to turn on the stored fat mechanism.
-Fred, the RMT
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I have heard good things about Stevia but haven’t really used it much. I think I will give it a try when I make the next batch of my low-carb chocolate pecan ice-cream (see recipes).
I do think some people have a hormonal milieu that makes it more difficult to lose the weight. The low-carb diet approach will lower the amount of insulin that you produce which is the primary hormone involved in the storage of fat. However, there are other hormones involved as well. For instance the sex hormones are involved and are the determinants of the different fat storage patterns we see when you compare a male physique to that of a female. It therefore makes sense that variations in female hormone levels will impact on the amount and distribution of their fat tissue and the effectiveness of their weight loss efforts. Another hormone implicated in weight gain is cortisol. This is typically high during periods of stress and probably promotes weight gain as part of our primordial survival system.
Although we like to get the instant gratification of seeing the pounds drop off, there are other benefits to carbohydrate restriction, over and above weight loss, and which are evident even in the absence of weight loss. The lipid improvements and the marked reduction in inflammatory markers, for instance. Another consideration is that the body may initially be “remodeling” by building lean tissue as the fat is burned off. This is more likely to occur in someone who has developed insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. People who experience this will usually notice their waist is shrinking even though they aren’t dropping weight. I hope your partner will stick with it as she should experience these other benefits and may eventually start dropping the pounds, as well.
http://thebunnellfarm.blogspot.com/
What is it about mice and fats. It seems all the negative reports about fats come from mice studies. This one links saturated fats to diabetes:
New research suggests diabetes transmitted from parents to children
A new study in the September issue of the Journal of Lipid Research suggests an unusual form of inheritance may have a role in the rising rate of diabetes, especially in children and young adults, in the United States.
DNA is the primary mechanism of inheritance; kids get half their genes from mom and half from dad. However, scientists are just starting to understand additional kinds of inheritance like metabolic programming, which occurs when an insult during a critical period of development, either in the womb or soon after birth, triggers permanent changes in metabolism.
In this study, the researchers looked at the effects of a diet high in saturated fat on mice and their offspring. As expected, they found that a high-fat diet induced type 2 diabetes in the adult mice and that this effect was reversed by stopping the diet.
However, if female mice continued a high-fat diet during pregnancy and/or suckling, their offspring also had a greater frequency of diabetes development, even though the offspring were given a moderate-fat diet. These mice were then mated with healthy mice, and the next generation offspring (grandchildren of the original high-fat fed generation) could develop diabetes as well.
In effect, exposing a fetal mouse to high levels of saturated fats can cause it and its offspring to acquire diabetes, even if the mouse goes off the high-fat diet and its young are never directly exposed.
The study used mice so it’s not time to warn women to eat differently during pregnancy and breastfeeding but earlier research has shown that this kind of inheritance is at work in humans. For example, there is an increased risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in children born of malnourished mothers.
Article link: http://www.jlr.org/cgi/content/abstract/M800033-JLR200v1
Source: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I had a look at the study and found that not only did they vary the intake of saturated fat but also total fat, carbohydrate, omega-6 fats, cholesterol and protein. In the high fat diet, the mice got 14 times as much arachidonic acid as those who ate the low-fat diet. As we know, ARA is quite pro-inflammatory. I suspect that it might be the inflammatory effect of the ARA or perhaps some other factor rather than an increase in saturated fats that produced the result. This is a problem when more than one variable is changed. It’s a pity they didn’t design the diets so only the amount of saturated fat was varied. Or maybe this wouldn’t have produced a publishable result.
Some interesting research on the cumulative damage of carbohydrate and sugar consumption on appetite and the brain. Dr. Jay, are you familiar with the research of Dr. Andrews?
From a report on http://www.physorg.com today:
The research by Dr Zane Andrews, a neuroendocrinologist with Monash University’s Department of Physiology, has been published in Nature.
Dr Andrews found that appetite-suppressing cells are attacked by free radicals after eating and said the degeneration is more significant following meals rich in carbohydrates and sugars.
“The more carbs and sugars you eat, the more your appetite-control cells are damaged, and potentially you consume more,” Dr Andrews said.
…
Dr Andrews said the reduction in the appetite-suppressing cells could be one explanation for the complex condition of adult-onset obesity.
“A diet rich in carbohydrate and sugar that has become more and more prevalent in modern societies over the last 20-30 years has placed so much strain on our bodies that it’s leading to premature cell deterioration,” Dr Andrews said.
Dr Andrews’ next research project will focus on finding if a diet rich in carbohydrates and sugars has other impacts on the brain, such as the increased incidences of neurological conditions like Parkinson’s disease.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
It is well known that a high-carb diet results in high levels of oxidative stress (free radicals) and that these can have deleterious effects on cell membranes and cellular physiological functions. There was a study recently that showed that a ketogenic diet fixes pediatric epilepsy due to the significantly reduced levels of oxidative stress in neurons. My colleagues, Drs. Phinney and Warden at UCDavis, are looking at the effects of uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) in mitigating the effect of a high-carb diet in mice. Everything I have seen along these lines suggest that one of the biggest benefits from significant carb restriction is this reduction of oxidative stress. Having said that, this report takes a big leap from what was actually found in the study, to what was reported in the press. I guess it is good to grab a headline now and then and anything that might point to a cause of obesity seems to do the trick.
Dr. Jay
I can sum it up in one short sentence.
“White mans food is poison!”
-Tom Bunnell
Dr. Jay. Thanks for the good advice.
I listened again to the Taubes interview on CBC radio’s “Quirks and Quarks” (Nov.27/07) and then listened to the mean spirited comments QQ received the following week. After listening to that and hearing on CBC’s “The National” that the American Pediatricians Association recommends that children as young as three take statin drugs, the gloves have come off so to speak. I wrote back to QQ to ask them to revisit this critical issue of diet and health and perhaps do a combined segment of the show with your study in Alert Bay. I also suggested they take a look at the whole topic of bad science. It would be great if QQ did a segment on the fallibility inherent to scientific enquiry as a whole and the soft totalitarianism of professional pride and profiteering that corrupts it. I also wrote a letter to a conventional dietician who has a column in our local newspaper but I have had no reply so far. I have written a synopsis of Taubes GCBC. which I give to every client I see. I would be happy to email you a copy if you like. Also, I am very interested in pH and health and have written an article on the topic to hand out to my clients. I would greatly appreciate it if I could email these two items to you and fellow bloggers for review and comments. I know you’re a very busy guy. Fred, the RMT
fhcory@eagle.ca
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I went back an listened to Gary Taube’s Quirks and Quarks interview again and, for those of you who haven’t already heard it, here is the url: http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/media/2007-2008/mp3/qq-2007-11-17_01.mp3
There is also a good print interview link provided by the CBC (http://web.mit.edu/knight-science/fellows/interviews/taubes.html) which has some further links to articles critical of Taubes. This makes for good reading since Gary is very good at defending himself while the entrenched, dogmatic approach of his critics is so obvious. It is interesting the lengths to which his critics will go to defend the status quo in the face of Gary’s patient and unrelenting exposure of the faux science that has been used to prop up the low-fat dogma, and the errors of his journalist colleagues in unquestioningly reporting bad science as fact.
Thanks for your suggestions and please feel free to post any items you want discussed.
There is an intersting article in the New York Sunday times about the Gila River Indian community in Arizona. They lost water access about 100 years ago and the government provided “food” –white flour, lard, canned meats and sugary processed foods. Not surprisingly, they have had a diabetes epidemic. The community recently won back water rights and plans to reintroduce farming of beans and other vegetables.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Their’s is an interesting and cautionary tale of how a diet high in refined carbs can have a devastating effect over time. Before their water was diverted, they were highly successful agrarians and supplied the US military during the early days of conquest and settlement in what is now the Southwest United States. Although, getting their water back is surely a good thing, I wouldn’t hold out much hope that it is going to reverse their epidemics of obesity and diabetes. I suspect they would not only have to return to their original diet, but also to the original way of preparing the land and growing and harvesting the food, all of which involved a lot of physical exertion. And even then, although that old lifestyle appeared to prevent the onset of obesity and diabetes, I am not sure it would be an effective treatment once these conditions have developed. I suspect that just like everyone else, once they have developed insulin resistance they really need to get on a low-carb diet to get better. Somehow, I don’t think getting their water back is going to deliver this result. I would love to be wrong.
Thanks for the advice about protein consumption in relation to my apparent reactive hypoglycemia Dr. Jay.
I’ve been experimenting with keeping protein under 1.5 g/kg of bodyweight per day. This has been such a hard problem to get a handle on, that I can’t say if it’s working or not as I still get symptoms sometimes after I eat, but the advice seems to be along the right path.
Against the advice of many, I’ve also been experimenting with skipping breakfast, because I find that my symptoms occur almost solely post-prandial and that the symptoms appear to be worst after eating in the morning. Not eating in the mornings appears to be one of the most effective therapies thus far.
My doctor was quite taken back as we talked about the potential causes for my problems and I indicated that after about a month and a half of recording what and when I ate, I found that I nearly always developed symptoms within about 45 minutes to 90 minutes of eating and that fasting did not produce symptoms. After some recent blood tests, she indicated that I had normal fasting blood sugar and insulin. I asked if it was possible to have normal fasting insulin and abnormal insulin production from eating, but she indicated that that was unlikely. Other interesting info that might relate to this are that when I am experiencing low blood sugar symptoms, my blood pressure is usually around 135 -140+/75-80, but when I have days that are asymptomatic, my bp is around 110/70-80.
I just wanted to write with an update and let you know that if you hear of anyone with symptoms like these or you have any other thoughts to share I’d appreciate anything you have to contribute.
I recently started a blog of my own to help people in my part of the country discover a healthy low-carb lifestyle. http://lowcarbnewengland.blogspot.com
I decided that living low-carb has had such a profoundly positive effect on my family’s life that I had to try to get the word out and help others find some of the good health and happiness I have discovered.
Well, thanks again for your blog, your insight, and “My Big Fat Diet”.
Sincerely,
Alex
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Let us know how it works out and good luck with your blog.
Hello Dr. Jay
My father has been obese for quite awhile, 10 years to be exact, and we have tried to implement a low carb diet on him for the past 3 years. But so far, it’s not working quite well as his weight fluctuates (losing 10 pounds for awhile and then gaining 10 pounds later on etc). Is it because carbohydrate is not entirely removed from his diet? We decreased his rice and noodles intake by 2/3 but not entirely, and we allow him to only eat certain fruits that we think are not too sweet such as kiwi and plums. Should we eliminate all carbohydrates in his meals then? Including fruits?
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
From the little you have told me I would suspect that your father has started developing insulin resistance. The way to get the fat out of the fat cells so it can be burned is to get insulin levels down. This is how a low-carb diet works since carbs drive insulin production. Once insulin resistance starts, however, the trick is to get the carbs low enough to overcome the tendency to produce too much insulin (hyperinsulinemia). I think it would be worth a try to cut carbs very low in a situation like this. It also helps to reduce hunger and carb cravings should go away more rapidly, as well. All the foods you describe contain carbs and when you tally it up you may be surprised how much carb your father eats in a day. To estimate the carb content I recommend going to the Atkins website and searching, “carb counter”. The “net carb” number is the one that is important. I try to stay under 50 gm/day, I find around 30 g/d is even better. You’ll find that that doesn’t allow too many carb-containing foods.
You are right on the money Dr. Jay! — You articulate and express yourself so well and you are so well balanced that it enthralls me. — You have it all! — Some of us have to get really really low on carbs to get those “carbohydrate cravings” to go away.
You have “coined” a new and very important word and phrase with “carb cravings” and “carbohydrate cravings”. — This is the first time I have heard it said this way and so accurately and descriptivly. — It’s perfect. — Congratulations. — This in itself is a major accomplishment. Native Americans have a way of getting right to the point explicitly. — It’s one of there many beauties.
http://weightloss.suite101.com/article.cfm/carbohydrate_craving_syndrome
Dr. Jay,
I was pleased to see “My Fat Diet” today on TV.
7 years ago I lost 32 pounds by following a similar weight management program. Suzanne Somers at that time had written a book on health and weight loss by limiting carb intake. Her book was informed by scientific research.
One year before her book was published a sports clothing manufacturer sponsored a trek to the far north which was meant to measure which materials keep a person the warmest. The results were mixed, however, they discovered that the individuals who volunteered to trek up north lost 20 to 30 pounds each. The unscientific conclusion – cold makes you lose weight. What had really happened was that the trekkers had eaten a high fat diet.
The fact that individuals who eat a low carb, high veggy/fruit diet generally have healthier blood pressure levels and lower cholesterol is worth further investigation.
I believe anti-oxidant polyphenolic components in vegetables and fruits are responsible for cardiovascular health, in particular polysaccharides, catechins, and xanthones. It is interesting to note that a traditional native diet probably included bark, lichen, or moss which is high in xanthone content.
Thank you for the opportunity to share my information.
Christina
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I am interested in the whole question of oxidative stress and its role in chronic disease. What seems to be a given is that glucose metabolism generates a lot of oxidative stress while the use of fat for fuel does not. If you follow that line of reasoning, it is logical that people eating a low-carb high-fat diet would need fewer anti-oxidants. This is a likely explanation for the fact that European arctic explorers could die of scurvy while their Inuit companions did not. It is clear that people who adhere to a very low-carb diet benefit in many ways and can reverse their problems with metabolic syndrome. I don’t think this can be attributed to the fact that they are eating healthy veggies and fruits, however. In fact, the virtual elimination of fruit would be necessary to achieve the low levels of carb needed to switch from glucose to fat metabolism for many people. I think the real issue is that cutting the carbs leads to much less oxidative stress to begin with, hence the beneficial outcomes.
Dr. Jay,
Two questions. I came across this abstract, which to my untutored mind suggests that a high-fat meal causes stress on the endothelium, which would increase risk of arterial damage and atherosclerosis. Have I misread this?
s-ICAM-1 and s-VCAM-1 in healthy men are strongly associated with traits of the metabolic syndrome, becoming evident in the postprandial response to a lipid-rich meal
Diana Rubin, Sandra Claas, Maria Pfeuffer, Michael Nothnagel, Ulrich R Foelsch, Juergen Schrezenmeir
Lipids in Health and Disease 2008, 7:32 (1 September 2008)
My other question is whether you know anything about this book:
The Great Cholesterol Con: The Truth About What Really Causes Heart Disease and How to Avoid It by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick
I just read it and the argument seems sound and accords with what I have read and had doubts about. Nonetheless, the fellow seems to be out on a limb.
Murray
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I will find that abstract and get back with my take on it.
I haven’t read Kendrick’s book. I did find what appears to be an informed critique of it here: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/Malcolm-Kendrick-Great-Cholesterol-Con.html
A follow-up to my previous comment. I note in the post-meal s-ICAM-1 and s-VCAM-1 study that the effect was attenuated by the presence of the antioxidants vitamin A and vitamin C. This suggests it is the oxidation of the lipids (i.e., the unsaturated fatty acids). Unsaturated fats in nuts have vitamin E and other antioxidants, but extruded unsaturated oils would have a greater tendancy to oxidation. This research suggests to me that vegetable oils should be avoided and it is good to have anti-oxidant rich vegetables with fat (or a multivitamin).
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I agree in that oxidative stress seems to be at the root of a lot of what goes wrong with us. The peroxidation of lipids in the cell membrane leads to metabolic dysfunction. High inflammatory levels are also likely due to high oxidative stress and all the parameters of metabolic syndrome correlate with high inflammatory levels. Eating foods rich in anti-oxidants is a good strategy but I think an even better one is to avoid the foods that raise oxidative stress levels. These would be mainly the refined carbohydrates – sugars and starches. While we need some PUFAs in our diet and these are vulnerable to oxidation, I think that most of the oils we eat should be mono-unsaturates like olive oil and saturates like those found in butter and lard.
For what it is worth, Dr. Eade on his protein power website gives the book (The Great Cholesterol Con) a favourable review.
Hi Dr. Jay
I have been on Atkins lo carb since seeing your doc. about Alert Bay. So, since March i am down forty pounds. I have to go lo fat as well because I am waiting for surgery on my gall bladder (I have atube in draining it); the tube has been in for 18 months. I just had a meeting with the anethesiologist who said i am still too hi risk. So i am still trying to lose more weight.
I had a question about why you seem to stress the use of cauliflower – any reason? My friend who lives in Kitimat says you were there so I was wondering if you are doing a tour? Any chance you would be coming to Williams Lake? The reason I am hi risk is because of some of my other problems ie: heart rhythm and blood pressure. Thanks for the chance to vent.
Ellie
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Congratulations, losing 40 pounds is no small achievement. Doing low-carb and low-fat at the same time is also a challenge. You are to be commended.
In Alert Bay, we didn’t push cauliflower. It was something that became popular initially as people started to use it as a replacement for rice. Then everyone became inventive and started using it for other recipes, as well. I think one of its appeals is that when you start low-carb you are initially at a loss for how you are going to replace the starch in your diet. Cauliflower can be made to appear like rice or mashed potatoes so it may help to calm the worries that a meal isn’t complete without a starchy food. As you get accustomed to low-carb you lose that fear, of course, and it becomes less important to eat faux-starches.
Yes, I was in Kitimat recently. I am not on a tour although, when communities ask me to speak, I try to accommodate.
Good luck with your surgery.
Dr. Jay
The only thing greater than this world crises we are in right now is the world carbohydrate crises we are in and that nobody knows or realizes we are in or that we are having.
Both defy description and the one is caused by the other.
We have lived to see this day.
The one could cure the other except it’s so big that nobody can grasp it as a reality.
Stimulants stir the more more more and the greed factor as well as the self interest and the I am a star factor.
Neither is solvable as there is no solving of unnatural acts that do not exist in true nature.
The solution — Improve our mental and psychical health by not eating and drinking the mammoth amounts of carbohydrates and other stimulants that we take so simply and for granted.
With our unstimulated feet and mind set back on this earth where we belong we can then care the best we can for ourselves and our young — as the bear and the wolf and the eagle and the fox, instead of being fools of folly as this earths peoples are now and have been doing.
At least we know what in the hell is going on.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
It looks like the world financial crisis may overtake the dietary crisis. If our food systems collapse as a result we may be forced to return to local agriculture and a diet devoid of all the highly refined and manufactured foods that are at the root of the high chronic disease burden. If this comes to pass, food self-sufficiency will become the hallmark of survival while the epidemics of obesity and diabetes will fade away as we are forced to do more manual work and eat less. It won’t be pretty but, I guess the one silver lining will be that we may end up more physically healthy. If we don’t starve first, that is.
as this earths peoples are now and have been for so long.
I’ve been following a low carb diet for 5 years. Have had good success improving my health and mental sharpness on it. I was very interested in your work and got the DVD so I could see the documentary. Great stuff!
But I’m in a debate with someone over whether or not eating a high carb diet causes Type 2 diabetes or whether it’s just an unlucky set of genes. My argument is that humans aren’t really adapted to eating high carb and diabetes, and other metabolic issues, are a result of that. There counter argument is that people have type 2 diabetes always had it but it isn’t “exposed” until they eat carbohydrates.
What’s your opinion, Dr. Wortman?
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Okay, this is just my opinion, but based on what I have seen and read over the past six years or so, I have come to believe that we have a genetically programmed threshold of tolerance for carbohydrates. If we exceed that threshold, over time we will damage our metabolic machinery and this will be manifested in the conditions that cluster around insulin resistance. Metabolic syndrome which includes high blood pressure and dyslipidemia is part of this. There are a bunch of other conditions known to cluster around metabolic syndrome, things like fatty liver disease, gastro-esophageal reflux, sleep apnea, osteoporosis, asthma, polycystic ovary syndrome, etc etc. Some of these things have been shown to improve dramatically when carbs are removed from the diet. Others have not been studied that way yet but I anticipate will respond in the same way when they are.
Some of my colleagues have been studying the effects of varying carbohydrate and fat levels in the diet and are finding that very high carb diets result in oxidative damage to cell membranes in multiple tissues. Damaged cell membranes lead to metabolic problems including insulin resistance. I think they are getting closer to explaining, not only why a low-carb diet improves a number of conditions, but also how a high carb diet can cause them.
Having said that, your friend is partially right in that some people will be more susceptible than others and that this is genetically programmed.
Anyway, just my humble opinion at this point.
Dr. Jay
Yes, and we still got to get rid of all the hybrid seed, which is all we have and which is impossible to do.
I have lost 20 lbs. in 6 weeks and I feel good. I have plateaued and I have not lost any weight recently. I have no intention of discontinuing the diet. I use to saute onions in a little bit of oil to liven up my meat dishes. My question is… can I have onions on this diet ?
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Onions, like all root vegetables, do contain some carbs. You will notice that when you caramelize onions, they taste sweet. That is the fructose coming out. I recall once buying some onion confite from a vendor alongside a canal in the south of France and it was so wonderfully sweet tasting, even though it had no added sugar. Anyway, back to low-carb reality, I would recommend that you use onion, but sparingly. It think it is asking too much to avoid it altogether. I use some thinly sliced onion, slightly caramelized, to flavour my breakfast frittata, for instance. Green onion is another good option. I will use green onion liberally for flavour, ditto for chives. The above ground portion contains no starch or sugar. Garlic is another good option. Although it also contains some carbohydrate, the amount you need to flavour a dish is so small that the carb content is negligible.
“Onions that make you cry” are much lower in sugar than common sweet onions. These are the common yellow onions that will keep for up to six months or even a year when stored properly. — The more you cry the lower in sugar they are and they taste great too.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I honestly don’t know if that is the case. I do know that onions add wonderful flavour to just about anything and it would be asking too much to avoid them altogether.
I’ve been reading and enjoying this blog for a long while now. Lowcarbing for about 6 years has made ALL the difference in the control of my long-standing diabetes. I follow Dr Richard Bernstein’s plan, limiting carb intake to 30gm daily. Dr Jay, you are definitely doing something of tremendous importance here…if more people would listen to you, it would go a long way toward reducing the human and financial costs of diabetes. Speaking of people listening to you, do you think that premier Harper’s new health minister, having a northern background, might have some degree of receptivity to your ideas? Best wishes, Bill
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
It sounds like you are on the right track. I have met Dr. Bernstein and I think he has done some great work in this area. I don’t hesitate to refer people to his material, especially type 1 diabetics.
I have not met the new Minister yet, but I am told she is interested in the relationship between diet and health.
Dr. Jay
I will trade somebody wild rice for some of that fish oil. — It’s hand harvested and hand parched by local natives on the reservation here and some of the best rice you will ever have.
This greater area here is the only place in the world that this rice exists.
If you or somebody would like to trade with me I would really like to have some of that oil and hopefully on an ongoing basis.
Otherwise I would like to buy some.
If you or somebody chose to do this we could maybe keep it up then for as long as we wanted. — Wild Rice is as perfect a food as is the oil.
I think both of our “Customs” Laws would allow this. — I’m not sure.
USA and Canada generally work pretty closely together. — These both being native commodities would also have some effect I would expect.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
The supply of oolichan grease is dwindling, unfortunately. In the coastal communities where it is a traditional food staple it has become very scarce. The reason for this is that the fish are not returning in the numbers they have in the past. This is a tragic situation for the coastal First Nations for whom this was a not just a food source but a cornerstone of their culture. All that to say that it is very unlikely that you will find a supplier who can provide you with grease. I wouldn’t completely rule it out but it would seem to be very unlikely.
Now, I must also add, that as wonderful as wild rice is, it is a carbohydrate food and if you are still eating significant amounts of it while doing low-carb, I don’t think you are going to fully benefit from carbohydrate restriction. Just my observation, you will be the judge of what works best for you.
http://cgi.ebay.com/10-LBS-MN-HAND-HARVESTED-WILD-RICE-WOOD-PARCHED_W0QQitemZ390002269780QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item390002269780&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66%3A2%7C65%3A16%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318
This is just an example showing what we are talking about. — This rice is excellent to be sure. — The one I’m offering is equal to the very best there is! — Some years are better than others and some lakes and ponds and rivers are better than others and the harvesting and care and curing of the rice all matter a lot.
Wild Rice is high carb, almost as high as brown or white rice. — For some reason it works beautifully for me on my low carb diet!
I think it’s nature calls for only the right amount to be eaten.
I believe it to be a perfect food!
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I don’t disagree that wild rice is a good food and that, historically, it was an important feature of the traditional diet in that area. Having said that, I still believe that once you have developed insulin resistance, it is important to cut all carbs, even if they were part of the traditional diet. The point is that if you had always eaten a traditional diet in the first place you wouldn’t have developed insulin resistance and you could therefore continue to eat traditional foods including those that are high in carbs. Now that you have developed insulin resistance you must proceed as though you have an intolerance to carbohydrates (which you do). It’s like lactose intolerance. As long as you avoid the foods you can no longer tolerate you should be fine. If you eat those foods, in this case carbs, there will be metabolic consequences. If you avoid them you will minimize or avoid altogether those consequences.
I must say, I am a bit hurt. I posted here weeks ago, saying some very enthusiastic and complementary things about Dr. Jay. A message appeared, saying it was being moderated, and my message has never appeared here. After reading the rules, I speculate that it was banned because I mentioned a book about low-carbohydrate therapy for diabetes. A tiny bit of checking would have shown that the book’s approach is very much in line with what Dr Jay practices, and the author is known to some of Dr Jay’s colleagues like Eric Westman. I will say again, that I think Dr Jay is doing wonderful work, and I wish him success.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
My profuse apologies. I have been distracted with other duties and have neglected to respond to yours and some other posts over the past couple of weeks. I think you are referring to Dr. Richard K. Bernstein’s book and, yes, I think it is valuable, especially for type 1 diabetics. Thanks for your support and for you patience.
Oh, OK!! Thanks so much!! I was too sensitive, I guess. Keep up the good work. Cheers, Bill
I believe that developed insulin resistance, after our addictions are fully broken and over time, leaves and we can eat normally again with normal cravings and desires. — Our body chemistry returns to normal and our psychological addictions are easily overcome with our new found strength and knowledge.
I wonder if there is any place in North America where anything like the aboriginal diet is still consumed. When I was a child, in about 1954, I live for a while in Point Barrow Alaska, at the time a very isolated inupiat village. A ship came once a year when the ice was out, with western supplies for the store. Mostly, what everyone ate was the old items. It was a place of fantastic abundance…whales, seals, salmon, caribou, geese. Everybody just loved the native foods. This was before snow machines, they hitched up the dogs to go on the seal hunts. Enough of the nostalgia…sadly, even then, western foods had made huge inroads. The US Navy had left thousands of cases of Coca Cola there after the war, and it was everywhere. It just WAS, nobody had to buy it. Hardtack, or “Pilot Biscuits” as they call them in Alaska, were very popular, and of course are complete carb/starch. Everyone liked sugar in their tea, too. I haven’t been back, but I’m told that now its all poptarts, sweet cereals and white bread. And you can be sure that diabetes and obesity are now there too. Would sure be nice if they could toss out that “goosik” stuff. Oh yes, they had oolikan too, though I don’t remember anyone making oil from them. Seal oil was very popular too. I remember a couple of old ladies who got bored while the men were out seal hunting, and walked almost 50km to the nearest other village, to socialize. The only food they took was some dried salmon and a poke of seal oil. Try to do that on sugars. “Eskimo icecream” back then meant snow, with seal oil and some berries, not the current version of crisco and sugar. Well, I am not all that old and so I hope that enough people still remember how it used to be, and how much healthier they were, to try to steer things back to where they should be.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Unfortunately, I think the penetration of junk food including refined starch and sugar has been complete. I don’t think there is anyplace in the Arctic where people are not consuming these introduced foods. I do think that consumption of traditional foods is greater than what we see in the lower latitudes and that this may have conferred some protection. Having said that, I expect we will see rising rates of obesity, diabetes and heart disease as the effects of the unhealthy eating overtakes these once sturdy people.
Concerning trans fats, I have a hypothesis I am exploring as to why some have proven harmful. Not all tans fats are bad. Conjugated linoleic acid, for example, is quite beneficial. So it cannot be the mere fact there is a trans- configuration of unsaturated bonds rather than a cis- configuration. It seems to me that the problem is that trans fats are unsaturated and are used to substitute for saturated in products that are advertised as having a long shelf life or are used for commercial cooking, for deep frying, etc., which would tend to cause high levels of oxidation. This suggests that the trans fats are used in a way that likely results in high levels of oxidation and rancidity. This also suggests a problem with unsaturated oils for cooking, etc. in general. In other words, the trouble with trans fats is the fact they are unsaturated, not that they are trans. The fact they are trans means they tend to get used in a way that creates greater exposure to rancid unsaturated fat, which would not have been the case with the saturated fats that the trans fats replaced
Dr. Jay, are you aware of any research that goes against this hypothesis?
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I don’t know of any research that argues that point one way or another. I understand that transfats cause our HDL to drop and LDL to rise. I am not aware that other unsaturated fats cause this to happen. I do find it odd, though, that we make such a big fuss over transfats when it is perfectly well known that a diet high in refined carbs causes HDL to drop and triglycerides to rise, and that they cause a shift to small dense LDL, yet we don’t see any great hue and cry to get these foods out of the food supply. Curious.
An interesting report on physorg.com today. The research found that the small intestine after a high-fat meal sends a class of phospholipid (NAPEs) to the hypothalumus to signal fullness. However, animals fed continual high-fat meals after 35 days began producing less NAPE, suggesting vulnerability to loss of appetite control. This might imply one should vary the fat content of meals, so as not to habituate the system to stop producing NAPEs. Here is an excerpt:—
“Researchers have discovered in studies of rats that one type of lipid produced in the gut rises after eating fatty foods. Those so called N-acylphosphatidylethanolamines or NAPEs enter the bloodstream and go straight to the brain, where they concentrate in a brain region that controls food intake and energy expenditure. …
Now, they show that NAPEs are secreted into circulation from the small intestine in response to ingested fat and that systemic administration of the most abundant circulating NAPE, at doses naturally found in the bloodstream, lowers food consumption in rats without making food unappealing to the animals.
By injecting radiolabeled NAPE into the animals, they found that the lipid enters the brain and is particularly concentrated in the hypothalamus. Infusions of NAPE directly into the brain also led the animals to cut back on calories, supporting the notion that its effects may be mediated through direct interactions with the central nervous system. Curiously, they also found that NAPE left the animals in what is sometimes described as a food coma.
Animals fed a high-fat diet for 35 days lose the normal increases in circulating NAPE after a fatty meal. That suggest that derangements in NAPE secretion associated with chronic high-fat feeding may contribute to diet-induced obesity precipitated by overexposure to triglyceride-rich foods. However, those animals still responded to NAPE treatment.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I find the science on appetite signaling mechanisms fascinating. We have to be careful, however, in how research like this is interpreted and translated to the human situation. Let’s not repeat the mistakes like the early cholesterol studies on rabbits, where animals fed a highly unnatural diet for rabbits developed pathologies and then it was assumed that humans fed the same diet would have the same problems. While animal diet studies can be very useful, there are limits to the extent they can be used to understand human physiology. I also think that signaling mechanisms are not the issue. We know the body has intricate feed-back and regulatory systems and it is fun to figure these out and maybe even profitable if you can invent a molecule that can be inserted to achieve some kind of benefit. I tend to be more interested in the bigger picture. In this case, I know that by eating a high fat diet (that would be low in carbs) one would expect to release fat from the adipose tissue because of lower circulating insulin. This would cause appetite to be reduced since there is an internal fuel source offsetting the need to eat. Once the weight loss stops, then one’s appetite would increase concurrently with the need to get those calories from dietary sources once again. Perhaps this would explain why the mice initially had an anorexic signal and that, over time, this signal stopped. I am only speculating here but, overall, when I see research like this I try to reconcile it with what I have observed at the macro level, ie that a high-fat, low-carb diet causes you to lose excess weight and to keep it off over time.
Here is an interesting report from physorg.com. This team has discovered that genetic variation leads to significantly different fat-processing metabolism within cells. This implies that nutritional strategies should be optimized at the ethnic and individual level and that wide population-based nutrition studies are next to useless (perhaps worse than useless–misleading).
“The team identified four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in genes coding for well-characterized enzymes of the lipid metabolism. Individuals with different genotypes in these genes have significantly different metabolic capacities with respect to the synthesis of some polyunsaturated fatty acids, the beta-oxidation of short- and medium-chain fatty acids and the breakdown of triglycerides.”
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I tend to agree. I think different dietary patterns work for different people. What I am most impressed with, however, is how consistently a very low carb diet seems to work for people who have developed insulin resistance. And conversely, how people who are overweight without insulin resistance seem to get about the same results from either low-carb or low-fat diets.
Hello again Dr. Jay.
Just wanted to say that my self-experiment is going well. I wanted to see if the 15lbs I’ve lost going low carb/high fat would remain off now that tennis season is over. As I hoped, in the nearly two months since the end of the tennis season my body has adjusted its caloric demand and my weight has remained the same at 150-153. lbs. I just lead an active life with my work as a massage therapist being my main calorie burning activity. Well, writing letters to the CBC burns quite a few, too!
I thought I’d post a synopsis of Gary Taubes’ book Good Calories, Bad Calories. People are welcome to copy and paste any of it for their own use. I would be happy to receive any feedback.
A Synopsis of
Good Calories, Bad Calories
Fred Cory, RMT
July, 2008
fhcory@eagle.ca
After a hugely successful feature article in the New York Times in 2002, which challenged the conventional wisdom that blames dietary fat as a primary factor in the epidemic rates of chronic disease such as heart disease, obesity, and Type II diabetes, Gary Taubes,* an award winning science journalist, was commissioned to write a more extensive work.
Good Calories, Bad Calories (2007 Knopf books) is the result of a five year exploration of the modern history of diet and health theory and the dietary etiology of these and other chronic, degenerative “diseases of western civilization”. It is estimated that 75% of health care costs go to treating chronic disease and Taubes makes a compelling case that dietary fat, far from being the culprit, is significant part of the solution. If Taubes’ conclusions based on data that is fastidiously cited in over 60 pages bibliography and 44 pages of notes are sound, then conventional medicine has been operating under a fundamental and colossal error and the advice that we have been given for 40 years to avoid these diseases is fundamentally flawed. Obviously, this would be a huge embarrassment to both the medical establishment, government, and the pharmaceutical industry. GCBC has been praised as “easily the most important book on diet and health to be published in the last 100 years.” – Richard Rhodes (Pulitzer Prize winner for non-fiction/history)
I first heard of Taubes when he was a featured guest on CBC radio’s popular science program “Quirks and Quarks”. His book is also a definitive reference in the present diabetes and obesity study “My Big, Fat Diet” in Alert Bay, BC where the Namgis First Nation community has been challenged to give up junk food for one year and return to their traditional high fat, high protein, high cholesterol primarily seafood diet. Incidentally, the Namgis have no word for “obesity” in their native language. This study is being chronicled by the CBC documentary program “The Lens” and has a website link at CBC.ca. Some of the early results of the study are nothing short of amazing. Under medical supervision many of the participants, many being morbidly obese, were allowed to discontinue their diabetes medication even after a matter of days after switching to their new/old traditional high fat diet. And those who are sticking with it are seeing their obesity problems safely and steadily melting away.
Taubes drops the gauntlet, as it were, and offers a simple proposition to the medical establishment in the form of two, simple and relatively very inexpensive clinical studies that could resolve the entire issue. But, because the medical, pharmaceutical, and food industries are so invested in both professional pride and profit to the dietary fat/heart disease hypothesis there has been little interest in taking him up on his offer. The other reason of course, is that a colossal error could be exposed that might well be very embarrassing for some but would be sweet vindication for others.
Another theme that threads through GCBC is a reminder of how vulnerable scientific enquiry itself is to corruption by the motives, status, and pre-conceived ideas of the scientist and the private interests of those who fund him. The book is peppered with pithy, cautionary quotes from the giants of science and philosophy as far back as Aristotle and advocates for those in the scientific community who over the years dared to speak out against “academic totalitarianism”. For many, professional marginalization and for some, even persecution was the price for going against the conventional wisdom. Taubes makes a deliciously ironic analogy that present day scientific authorities are not unlike the irreproachable cardinals and bishops of Rome in the Renaissance. In effect, today’s “scientific clerics” have robed themselves in their own beliefs and dogma and beware anyone who dares to challenge their authority. The oppressed becomes the oppressor…
GCBC also brings great comfort and renewed inspiration to the millions of people who put their trust in the conventional advice and yet struggle unsuccessfully to achieve their goals regarding weight-loss and heart-healthy living. It is nothing short of tragic that the millions of failed attempts at weight-loss are not because of weak will-power and sloth but more on decades of bad public health policy, a multi-billion dollar low-fat food industry, and of course the persuasive power of “Big Pharma” and the array of drugs they aggressively peddle to lower cholesterol, blood pressure, etc. The colossal failure of this flawed dietary fat hypothesis has brought our precious Canadian publicly funded health care system to the brink of collapse. Though great strides have been made in treating chronic illness, the numbers of people getting ill steadily increase. Practice makes perfect…
Taubes lists “ten inescapable conclusions based on the existing knowledge” in the epilogue of GCBC. The implications of some of these conclusions are astounding:
• “Dietary fat, whether saturated or not, is not a cause of obesity, heart disease, or any other chronic disease of civilization.
• The problem is the carbohydrates in the diet, their effect on insulin secretion, and thus the hormonal regulation of homeostasis––the entire harmonic ensemble of the human body. The more easily digestible and refined the carbohydrate, the greater the effect on our health, weight, and well-being.
• Sugars––sucrose and high fructose corn syrup specifically––are particularly harmful, probably because the combination of fructose and glucose simultaneously elevates insulin levels while overloading the liver with carbohydrates
• Through their direct effect on insulin and blood sugar, refined carbohydrates, starches, and sugars are the dietary cause of coronary heart disease and diabetes. They are the most likely dietary causes of cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and the other chronic diseases of civilization.
• Obesity is a disorder of excess fat accumulation, not overeating, and not sedentary behavior.
• Consuming excess calories does not cause us to grow fatter, any more than it causes a child to grow taller. Expending more energy than we consume does not lead to long-term weight loss; it leads to hunger.
• Fattening and obesity are caused by an imbalance––a disequilibrium–in the hormonal regulation of adipose tissue and fat metabolism. Fat synthesis and storage exceed the mobilization of fat from the adipose tissue and its subsequent oxidation. We become leaner when the hormone regulation of the fat tissue reverses this balance.
• Insulin is the primary regulator of fat storage. When insulin levels are elevated–either chronically or after a meal––we accumulate fat in our fat tissue. When insulin levels fall, we release fat from our fat tissue and use it for fuel.
• By stimulating insulin secretion, carbohydrates make us fat and ultimately cause obesity. The fewer carbohydrates we consume, the leaner we will be.
• By driving fat accumulation, carbohydrates also increase hunger and decrease the amount of energy we expend in metabolism and physical activity.”
To summarize ? low-fat diets often fail because:
• EATING LESS AND EXERCISING MORE LEADS TO HUNGER. BECAUSE WE ARE TOLD TO AVOID DIETARY FAT WE THEN GET SHORT-TERM SATIETY FROM CARBOHYDRATE.
• CARBOHYDRATE, ESPECIALLY IN REFINED FORM, ELEVATES INSULIN.
• STORED FAT WILL NOT BE USED FOR FUEL AS LONG AS INSULIN LEVEL IS ELEVATED.
In practice the data would suggest that we:
• Drastically reduce consumption of bread, pasta, rice and eat grain-based foods only their whole-grain form.
• Sweets should only be consumed as a rare, special treat if at all (high cocoa chocolate is less harmful)
• Avoid all “diet” “fat-free” “sugar free” and “junk” foods and beverages because they do not satiate and indeed make us hungrier. They are also acidifying and adversely affect the body’s acid/alkaline balance.
• Freely consume high fat foods such as eggs, high-fat yogurt, all meats and sea-foods, nuts, dairy (butter, cheeses, and milk).
• Freely consume low starch vegetables and fruits preferably in raw form. Avoid fruit juice.
• Alcohol always in moderation.
I urge anyone who is interested in this topic to buy Taubes’ book and enjoy it in its entirety and then lend it to your family doctor.
Be well. Fred Cory, RMT. fhcory@eagle.ca
Also, there is a fascinating 2hr.webcast lecture by Taubes’ on obesity. http://webcast.berkeley.edu/event_details.php?webcastid=21216 Also check out “My Big, Fat Diet” http://www.cbc.ca/thelens/bigfatdiet/ as mentioned above. The site has clips of the TV documentary, a blog hosted by the head physician, and is a web resource site on the current medical study. (This would be an excellent classroom project). And here
is a site that gives some information about statin drugs and their side-effects.
http://www.westonaprice.org/moderndiseases/statin.html
*Gary Taubes, author of Bad Science and Nobel Dreams, is a correspondent for Science magazine. The only print journalist to have won three Science in Society Journalism awards, given by the National Association of Science Writers, he has contributed articles to The Best American Science Writing 2002 and The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2000 and 2003. He lives with his wife and son in New York City.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Quite a tribute to Gary Taubes! I think he deserves it. He was in Vancouver recently speaking at a conference I organized and we spent some time together. I was humbled by his dedication and perseverance. He kind of stumbled into this and now that he has seen the potential for good, he finds himself driven to keep pushing the message. I highly recommend his book.
A report out on research into sugar addiction at Princeton University. Looks like our observation that resistant to low-carb seems energized by carbohydrate addiction may be spot on.
“Hoebel has shown that rats eating large amounts of sugar when hungry, a phenomenon he describes as sugar-bingeing, undergo neurochemical changes in the brain that appear to mimic those produced by substances of abuse, including cocaine, morphine and nicotine. Sugar induces behavioral changes, too. “In certain models, sugar-bingeing causes long-lasting effects in the brain and increases the inclination to take other drugs of abuse, such as alcohol,” Hoebel said. … Hungry rats that binge on sugar provoke a surge of dopamine in their brains. After a month, the structure of the brains of these rats adapts to increased dopamine levels, showing fewer of a certain type of dopamine receptor than they used to have and more opioid receptors. These dopamine and opioid systems are involved in motivation and reward, systems that control wanting and liking something. Similar changes also are seen in the brains of rats on cocaine and heroin.
In experiments, the researchers have been able to induce signs of withdrawal in the lab animals by taking away their sugar supply. The rats’ brain levels of dopamine dropped and, as a result, they exhibited anxiety as a sign of withdrawal. The rats’ teeth chattered, and the creatures were unwilling to venture forth into the open arm of their maze, preferring to stay in a tunnel area. Normally rats like to explore their environment, but the rats in sugar withdrawal were too anxious to explore.”
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Now I know why, when I first stopped eating carbs, my teeth chattered and I was afraid to leave the house! Kidding aside, I have often reflected on the fact that my experience in the initial period after discontinuing carbs seemed to me to be very much like a drug withdrawal. In fact, when counseling people who are starting a low-carb diet I warn them that this may be their initial experience. The evidence from this study dovetails nicely with other bits of evidence which also suggest there is an addictive effect associated with carb consumption. In one of those studies, overweight women were manipulated to lower mood and then offered a choice of drinks, one of which had a high sugar content. The beverages were disguised so that the sugary one could not be identified. They found that the women consistently selected the sugar drink to elevate their mood. I also attended a presentation at a conference in which we were shown brain scans on people who had stopped eating carbs and people withdrawing from addictive drugs. They were virtually identical. I think this is useful information for people who want to cut carbs and reinforces my belief that cold-turkey is the best option.
two comments…
I think we should stop calling this a diet, it’s a lifestyle. It’s my ‘no sugar, no flour, no potato’ lifestyle. (45 pounds off since Mar)
And, second, one of the biggest values of this lifestyle for me is mental clarity. When I slip into the carbs, I also slip into lethargy, mood swings, depression and the problem is that it takes a while to notice. A day or two back without carbs and the head clears.
Dr Jay’s Reply:
I tend to agree. Especially for those who have developed insulin resistance, it appears that avoidance of carbs can ease the signs and symptoms but that the underlying problem is not fixed. This means that a resumption of carb-eating will cause the problems to return. In those cases it should be viewed as a food intolerance, ie you have developed an intolerance to carbohydrates. It’s like lactose intolerance, you are fine as long as you don’t eat lactose.
Your point on mental clarity is important. I hear this from a lot of people.
Dr. Jay,
It looks as though Ms. Beck had the comments removed from this weeks column–maybe because of us. I found it disingenuous that she implied fat and sugar caused dopamine responses the week after I referred to the work at Princeton linking just sugar addiction-related changes to dopamine receptors.
On another matter, I note the following research from Yale on the unreliability of Framington risk indicators, based on CT scans of coronary plaque. I have seen the “Track your Plaque” group website, which advocates people getting CT scans to measure coronary plaque and claim some success in reducing coronary plaque through diet changes. They are very big on reducing saturated fats. I wonder if this is based on empirical experience through diet modification and CT scans on the same person over time, and if so, how much control is there to distinguish the contribution of saturated fats (if any) as compared to other changes in the diet for that person?
Ever-probing, as always.
Cheers
Murray Braithwaite
ScienceDaily (Jan. 16, 2009) — The Framingham and National Cholesterol Education Program tools, NCEP, do not accurately predict coronary heart disease, according to a study performed at the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, CT.
The study included 1,653 patients who had no history of coronary heart disease; although 738 patients were taking statins (cholesterol lowering drugs like Lipitor) because of increased risk of developing coronary heart disease. All 1,653 patients underwent a coronary CT angiogram and doctors compared their risk of coronary heart disease, determined by the Framingham and NCEP risk assessment tools, to the amount of plaque actually found in their arteries as a result of the scan.
Results showed that 21% of the patients who were thought to need statin drugs before the scan (because of the Framingham and NCEP assessment tools) did not require them; “26% of the patients who were already taking statins (because of the risk factor assessment tools) had no detectable plaque at all,” said Kevin M. Johnson, MD, lead author of the study.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I think the case for saturated fat and heart disease is very weak. Saturated fat causes HDL (good cholesterol) to go up. There was a study at Harvard a couple of years ago which showed that, in post-menopausal women, those who ate the most saturated fat had the least progression of arterial plaque. In Jeff Volek’s most recent study on low-carb vs low-fat diets, he showed that people who ate triple the amount of saturated fat but very few carbs had better lipids than those who ate the supposedly healthy heart association diet which was low in saturated fat. Personally, I eat as much as I can while significantly cutting carbs and my lipids are fine, along with everything else.
Oops. Jumped to a conclusion. The comment links have been restored. Must have been a Globe & Mail website glitch.
Thanks, Dr. Jay for the considered response on saturated fats. Personally, I love artisan cheeses and my body really feels satisfied and good after eating really fine cheese (as a meal especially), more so than any other food. My wife and I ate an entire Vacherin Mont D’Or for lunch one dayduring the Christmas holidays, and it was divine! I would really like to know that the saturated fats are okay. Nonetheless, years of conditioning that saturated fats are bad, and my general sceptical nature (on every side of any question), keep me looking for reliable evidence on either side of the question of saturated fats. The fact I eat a lot of cheese shows where I feel the evidence points so far.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
We have been so indoctrinated on the evils of fat that it is still hard to shake that off, even in the face of good evidence. I remember when I started eating low carb and was indulging in all the fatty foods that I had previously avoided. I was eating a lot of fatty meats, butter, cream, cheese and eggs and doing very well in terms of weight loss and blood sugar and blood pressure control. After several months of this, I decided to get my lipids checked and I remember feeling at the time that now the party would be over, that I would have to face the music and figure out how to continue to eat low carb and low fat at the same time. Then, of course, my lipid results came back and they were excellent. Since then, I have taken comfort, not only in my own test results, but in the accumulated scientific literature that is consistently telling us that it is the carbs, not the fats, that are at the root of our problems of obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes. As I said earlier, I now eat as much wholesome fat, including saturated fat, as I can. The only ones I avoid are transfats and the vegetable oils that are high in omega-6.
With respect to the cheese, it occurs to me that when you scratch the surface of any ancient diet you find at its core a central fat. On the west coast it was oolichan grease, on the prairies it was buffalo fat, in the north, caribou, moose and bear fat, and among the Inuit, whale fat. I think that cheeses may have played an equivalent role in the ancient diets of Europe. In either case, I hope you continue to enjoy them in good health!
Hi Dr. Jay
I am having a real hard time since xmas.Had daughter and kids visiting and of course lots of carbs in the house. I gained 8 lbs and cant seem to take it back off.
I am back on strictly carbs but have stayed the same since indulging and I gave away all the stuff i shouldn’t have. I have bacon and eggs (1 egg, 2 whites) usually at 10 am as i am retired and don,t get up early and then a meal of protein and veggies in the evening, mainstays are cauliflower, onions, zucchini, cabbage, then another snack of cheese or meat. I am sedentary and use 6 gms of carbs with cream in my coffee (4 cups a day) and 4 carbs for salad dressing on my raw cauli. Can you see any place i could improve? I feel i am wasting time cause i would like to get my surgery done next summer but have to lose at least 50 lbs before the anethesiologist will do it. What is the thing with net carbs? I am insulin resistant and have passed it on to all my 7 kids as they all have weight issues. Another thing i have been doing is drinking herb tea and one can of diet pepsi which i water down half and half. I also very seldom feel hungry, just eat cause i know i have to to get my metabolism working (i think?).
Sorry to be so long winded. Thanks for any advice.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
It is not uncommon for people who have successfully lost weight on a low-carb diet and who have then regained weight by eating carbs again to have difficulty the second time around. This is a phenomenon I have discussed with my colleagues who have many years of experience treating people with low-carb diets and nobody has a good explanation for why this happens. By the sounds of it, your lapse was not a huge one so I would encourage you to stay the course. When you say you have 6 gms of carbs with your, I am assuming that is what is contained in the cream. If not, that would be a good place to cut some more carb. A little artificial sweetener or stevia would is always better than any type of sugar, refined or natural. If you have profound insulin resistance, the threshold below which your insulin needs to fall to facilitate the burning of fat may be quite low. I know mine is. I had started to eat too many nuts and that relatively small amount of carbs was enough to cause me some weight gain so I recently cut them out of my diet entirely. Also, the carbs in your salad dressing makes me wonder whether you are using a commercial preparation that has added sugar, as many do. The other hazard there, of course, is that they also tend to use the omega-6 rich vegetable oils, too. You may want to look for alternatives like perhaps making your own dip using olive oil and no sugar.
When you say you eat one egg and two whites, my suggestion would be to go ahead and enjoy two whole eggs. When you are eating low-carb your system can handle lots of fat, including saturated fat, without causing a cholesterol problem. I eat at least two eggs every day and three-egg omelettes when I am skiing, which is most weekends.
Don’t be discouraged, you are on the right track!
Dr. Jay, I have found that since going fairly low carb (no cereal grains or other starchy food, limited fruits other than berries, only occasionally a spoonful of dessert or other sweets) that I have experienced reversal of greying of my hair. Perhaps this is merely post hoc ergo propter hoc and something else explains it. No less stress in my life; perhaps just an effect of greater caloric restriction. Do you have any experience or information in this regard. Of all the reasons to lower carbohydrate consumption, this one has had the most effective emotional appeal for my wife.
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I find your observation fascinating. I would speculate that the reduced oxidative stress and anti-inflammatory effect of a low-carb diet may be the explanation. If we could show that it reversed baldness, too, we would make a fortune!
Dear Dr Jay,
I started this ‘diet ‘ only yesterday. I was wondering if there is a list anywhere of all of the types of protein one can eat, (and ideas for different proteins which are “Allowed”, and a list of all the fats (may one have ANY type of fat, and as much as one wants in a day?)
Also is one allowed fruit at all?
I am so excited for this to work !
Thank you so much!
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
I don’t know of such a list of protein foods. Basically, I advise people that there is no limit on meats, poultry or seafoods. People tend not to overeat protein unless they are consciously doing so while avoiding both carbs and fat. This is not a good way to go. In terms of fat, again there is no limit in terms of quantity. You should avoid the vegetable oils that contain too much omega-6, however. The best one is olive oil, followed by high-oleic safflower and canola. Eat the fats that come with the meat and seafood and all the butter and cream that you want. Whether or not to eat fruit will depend on how profound is your insulin resistance. If you must eat fruit, the dark berries are good as they are low in sugar and rich in other good things.
Alas, no regression of balding.
Dr. Jay, another couple of mouse studies where they are fed high-fat diets. Today’s is reported in Science Daily News, “Excessive Dietary Fat Caused 300 Percent Increase in Metastasizing Tumor Cells In Animal Models.” (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090225172639.htm)
“Excessive” fat increased the activity of cancer tumours and promoted their spread. Interestingly, linoleic acid (omega-6) was implicated but oleic acid (olive oil, avocado) was not.
“The researchers used the imaging and cell-counting tools to document that linoleic acid, which is predominant in polyunsaturated fats, caused increasing membrane phase separation, whereas oleic acid, found in monounsaturated fats, did not. Increased membrane phase separation could improve the opportunity of circulating tumor cells to adhere to blood vessel walls and escape to organs far from the original tumor site. The new findings support earlier evidence from other research that consuming high amounts of polyunsaturated fat may increase the risk of cancer spreading.”
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Thanks for the links. I agree that the omega-6 rich oils should be avoided. We appear to be getting far too much omega-6 in the standard American diet. This is why I recommend using only olive oil, canola oil or high-oleic safflower oil (if you can find it). The net effect of excessive omega-6 appears to be pro-inflammatory which would be consistent with higher cancer morbidity as was seen in this study. It’s ironic that the push to use vegetable oils to avoid cardiovascular disease not only appears to have been useless for that purpose but also appears to have made cancer morbidity worse. Simple, wholesome natural foods are the best. We seem to get into trouble when we stray from the basics.
Dear Dr Jay,
Sorry another question – is one allowed cheese at all on this diet?
Thank you !
Dr. Jay’s Reply:
Yes, cheese is allowed. Make sure it is real cheese, not the processed stuff. Harder cheeses tend to be lower in carb although I have a weakness for the soft, creamy french varieties!
Dr. Jay
It has taken me over two and a half years to find my way to and then finally focus on Keytosis, with it’s what’s and why’s and how’s of and how ketosis or keytones pertains to our health and what it is and what it means and what this says.
Mine is a “no forced exercise” diet — None!
I’m listening to Jimmy Moore’s Podcast interview today while I’m writing you.
He and his guest today are pro exercise and pro supplement and pro vitamines. — I am neither and none.
Water and food is what I believe in. — Natures perfect plan!
This Keytosis, or rather keytones being expelled in our urine thing, I believe, is simply a byproduct of our bodies sensing we are too fat and then removing this excess fat in order to optimize our health so we can run and fight and breed and feed and raise our families and young. — The keytones show up in our urine during this excess fat burning and fat rendering process.
Simple but important and the fact that this only occurs when we remove the excess carbohydrates from our diets, as in your “Traditional Diet” that I believe so much in and the fact that this process quits immediately if we add sugar or starch back into our diet.
There are a lot of rabbit trails out there, — I just wanted to complement you on and your position in all this and your so very vital leadership in a healthy way to eat and live.
I have been in a long stall but I got this thing going again. — Thanks for your time and patience.
Tom
http://thebunnellfarm.blogspot.com/2009/03/261-on-day-294-wednesday-march-18-of-my.html
http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/acetylcoa/acoajm.htm
Dr. Jay
I’m thinking this might interest you.
What is the reason coffee is so bad? I have 1 cup a day. Is that too much? If it is, is an occasional coffee OK?
And mayonaise made from olive oil…is that alright to use?
Dr Jay’s Reply:
Sorry for the delay in replying.
Caffeine is supposed to give you a little insulin surge which can interfere with releasing fat from you adipocytes. If you are happy with your weight loss you shouldn’t worry about it. If you are stuck and not losing weight as expected, then it might be something to consider.
As long as the mayo isn’t made from high omega-6 vegetable oils and doesn’t contain a lot of sugar, I would include it in your diet. Olive oil is great, of course but it is hard to find mayo made exclusively with olive oil. Probably the best you are going to find is a mix of olive and canola which is okay.
Taanshi, hello, Dr. Jay,
My name is Heather. I am a Metis woman married to a First Nations man living in a small Aboriginal community the Parkland region of Manitoba. The vast majority of our people are obese (including my husband) and suffer terribly from a variety of chronic diseases, including, of course, diabetes.
Our community is about about 70% Metis and 30% First Nations. We live next to a reserve and there is another Aboriginal community (about 70% Metis and 30% First Nations) on the other side of it as well. The total population of our three communities is about 2,500.
I was very interested to listen to your CBC radio interview and how health/diet research could have an impact on access to traditional foods (hunting, fishing, gathering, etc.). The traditional land use of our three communities overlaps greatly and so do our socio-ecnomic and health problems. (We are intermarried, so this is no surprise!). I am sure that many individual community members and all our communities would benefit greatly by going on the the type of eating plan you are suggesting.
I would like to know what kind of support might be available to Aboriginal individuals and communities wanting to try what you seem to be advocating? I am very much interested in community development and may be taking a CDO position in our community.
Kihchi-marsii por ton travaai! Thanks so much for your work! (Michif as spoken in Manitoba)
Eekoshi pitamaa. That’s it for now.
Heather
Dr Jay’s Reply:
I think there are lots of people out there who can benefit from this dietary approach with a little bit of information and minimal ongoing support. I say this because I know people who have done it. I am interested in setting up an approach that can deliver this. I am thinking that it could work using telemedicine technologies like video conferences and web conferences. I would be interested in exploring this further. I expect that if a community wanted to do this, there would need to be a “champion” in that community to organize things, preferably someone working in the health sector.
Taanshi kihtwaam, Dr. Jay,
I have been thinking about how it would be possible to make eating a healthy traditional (or quasi-traditional) diet affordable in our community. Since many Aboriginal people have low incomes, they eat a lot of refined carbohydrates (bannock, bread, potatoes, noodles, etc.) as “fillers” and poor quality oil and margerine for fats. This is the case in my community. Of course, those that are employed and have decent-paying jobs could potentially purchase all the healthy food they need. However, what can be done to help the others? Food security is a huge issue in our rural community and many other rural and inner-city communties around the country….
I guess part of the answer is if possible to go back to hunting and fishing and gathering foods for ourselves. (When the land we use and the traditional foods we eat are not contaminated, that is!) However, hunting and harvesting is not possible for all people–even those living in rural and remote locations. (Pollution, lack of hunting equipment, disabilities, age, etc.) I guess that is where we have to think about what IS possible. We need to think about the possiblity of raising our own meats and eggs in an environmentally sustainable manner and/ or figure out ways to purchase locally-produced meats and eggs that are healthful and raised in a sustainable manner at reasonable prices. For most of us, growing at least some of our own vegetables is possible if only in planters. What we can’t grow ourselves, we need to figure out how to get locally if possible and then find a way to preserve them (freezing?) on limited budgets. (We need more chest freezer purchase programs such as that run by the Bayline Round Table in Northern Manitoba!).
Then there are the teas and fats to think about…. I know that I can harvest much of what locally for teas. However, I do not have much practical knowledge about when to drink what….
As for the fats, I am thinking that the “healthy spread” recipe (that you mentioned elsewhere on your blog) 2 parts butter to 1 part olive oil to 1 part canola oil may workout to being the same or cheaper than a “good quality” margerine…. I will try it out and inform you of the results.
I also if there is a way to ensure that we get enough salt and magnesium from our diets without having to take supplements? (Of course, salt is cheap and magnesium is pretty cheap as well!)
Dr. Jay, have you heard about the Northern Healthy Food Initiative in northern Manitoba? There are quite a few folks involved in Community Development, food security issues, environmentally sustainable agriculture as well as Indian Bands, Aboriginal and Northern Affairs communities, Public Health Agency of Canada, and Aboriginal and Northern Affairs Mantioba that are involved in it. It is gaining a lot of attention for its work.
Recently, there was a Norther Grocers Forum in Thompson hosted by some of the groups involved in the Northern Healthy Food Initiative. One of the issues that came up was the price of milk vs alcohol. The provincial government subsidizes the transportation of alcohol to many northern towns and cities but not milk. This became a huge issue. Considering , that so many Aboriginal people are lactose intolerant and that lactose is a carbohydrate that may need to be eliminated from many people’s diets, I am thinking we need to think of alternative ways to ensure people ( especially children and expectant mothers) get enough calcium. Those of us near lakes with sucker fish (mullet) could potentially get a lot of it from “grind fish” (ground with the “Y” bones in) or mullet canned like salmon. However, this may not work for most people–especially those in the cities….
The more I think about going back to a traditional diet, the more I realize how truly complex the issue really is! That in order to be truly healthy we need access to a healthy land base and to have the resources required to hunt/fish/harvest and grow healthy food. At the same time, I refuse to get overwhelmed! I will start where I am–with myself and my own family and go from there. We will again go out to gather seagull eggs and hunt geese this spring. This summer we will have a larger garden than last, freeze more vegetables and gather more medicines for tea, etc. We hunt and fish and almost exclusively eat wild meat and fish. (I will try canning mullet this year as well!) Let’s see where this lead us….
Eekoshi pitamaa! That is it for now!
Heather
PS: I really think you might find some excellent supporters at organizations such as Manitoba Food Charter and Heifer International Canada and others involved in the Northern Healthy Food Initiative. I will send on some of the documents and links I have collected on your work!
Dr Jay’s Reply:
Thank you for sharing your ideas. My apologies for taking so long to reply.
I am interested in developing links with any groups who are looking at traditional diet, diabetes, food security and related issues. I am also interested in research collaborations in those areas.
The return to traditional foods is a good idea but not always practical for everyone. One of the main things I have learned in my research is that you can approximate the traditional diet and still benefit greatly if you have problems like obesity, metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes. The main thing is to restrict the carbohydrates, especially refined carbs and sugar, all forms of sugar, and get comfortable with eating fat for energy. Just those simple changes can have a dramatic effect. Of course, it would be even better if one did this using traditional foods.
Hello Dr. Jay,
Can you tell me where I can find a copy of the diet? Also, are whey protein drinks OK on the diet? I’ve been working with a nutritionist to lose weight and she recommended the high protein shakes. She is also recommending nuts and seeds. Is it Ok to have a lower fat diet using your plan? My gallbladder was removed a few years ago and I sometimes have trouble digesting certain things. I’m not sure if it is related to fat, but there are many foods which upset my stomach. Also, which fats are the omega 6 ones that you keep referring to? I love avocados. Thanks for all of the posts and your answers. I found them quite helpful! Alison
Dr Jay’s’ Reply:
There is no printed copy of the diet I can offer yet. I am planning to write the book soon, though. In the meantime, I suggest people look at the Atkins diet. The diet I use is similar to the Induction Phase of Atkins. Although Atkins recommends 2 weeks on Induction, I have stayed on this diet for almost seven years now.
If the protein shakes are carb free and do not contain fats high in omega-6, they won’t be a problem. Have a close look at the label for ingredients and see how many grams of carb are on the nutrition chart and what kinds of fats are used.
The omega-6 oils are basically all the vegetable oils except olive, canola and high-oleic safflower (I think this one is available only in the US at the moment). Avocados are good.
It would be hard to eat this diet without increasing your fat intake at some point. While you are losing weight on the diet, you are burning off your stored fat. Once the weight loss stops you need to replace those fat calories by adding fat to your diet. I would suggest trying this starting with olive oil and then adding in other fats slowly to see what you can tolerate. I think you may find your stomach problems will be manageable. Too many nuts and seeds can be a problem because they do contain carbs. I used to eat nuts but find I do better without them. It will depend on your level of tolerance to carbs which I think is determined by how much insulin resistance you developed before starting the diet.
I hope it all works out for you.
can you use mayonaise during the induction period? I use Hellman’s olive oil mayo
Dr Jay’s Reply:
Yes. I like Hellman’s because it is made with canola and olive oils. Remember to avoid the other vegetable oils as they are too high in omega-6.
Dr. Jay
Sensory overload is what I believe to be at the core of carbohydrate addiction and it’s symptoms.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPDTEuotHe0
O J Simpson was in sensory overload when he killed his wife and he was in it again when he burst into that room in his most recent conviction in Los Vegas.
O. J. has been a stimulant addict for many decades. Amphetamines and cocaine by the gallon at his house, not to mention caffeine and sugar and carbohydrates.
The Inca high priests considered caffeine in the form of chocolate to be a link to paradise. — There senses were enhanced.
They also hybrid corn and potatoes.
These are extreme examples to be sure but to open the conversation regarding autism and stimuli and our senses and carbohydrates and our minds and emotions is the second facet after diabetes and heart disease and blood pressure regarding carbohydrates.
Sensory overload effects our thyroid glands and our hormones dramatically.
The mental aspects of carbohydrate addiction are profound and far reaching.
Thanks for allowing me to express myself.
Tom
Hi Dr. Jay, hope all is well.
I came across this interesting report today of research showing that mice differ from human in the proteins involved in glucose transport into muscle cells. I am not sure what this means for interpreting glucose metabolism on mice, but thought you might find it interesting. “See Researchers discover new glucose-regulating protein linked with diabetes” May 28th, 2009 http://www.physorg.com/news162739002.html
Here is the discovery in a nutshell, from the report:
In humans, muscles play a key role in clearing glucose from the bloodstream, Brodsky explained. In normal function, this is controlled by insulin, which stimulates the muscle cells to import glucose by means of a system known as the GLUT4 glucose transporter.
Normally, she said, GLUT4 is stored inside both human and mouse muscles in a special compartment that releases it upon insulin stimulation. Fat cells also form a GLUT4 compartment and take up glucose in response to insulin. In type 2 diabetes, however, the muscle and fat cells fail to respond appropriately to the insulin and the GLUT4 compartment is abnormal. This process was thought to be identical across mammal species.
The current research identified a protein in both human muscle and fat cells, called CHC22, which appears to control the formation of the GLUT4 storage compartments.
The team determined that this protein is a specialized form of a ubiquitous housekeeping protein called clathrin, which Brodsky has studied since the 1980s and is known to be instrumental in moving proteins between cellular compartments. CHC22 was observed to be associated with the abnormal GLUT4 compartments in muscles from diabetic patients which, for some reason, do not mobilize to the muscle cell surface when stimulated by insulin.
Notably, she said, while mice also have an insulin-responsive GLUT4 compartment, they lack the CHC22 protein. As a result, this work has implications for developing better models for the study of type 2 diabetes.
Murray
Dr. Jay, — I just found out that there is no lactose in clarified butter. I am making some right now.
Hi Dr. Jay
I am still on the low carb and managing to stay true to it. I have gone off a few times but always get right back to it.My diet was 2 eggs /bacon and protien and vegies for dinner with a snack of cheese in the afternoon. i have two cups of coffe with cream . my carbs have been at 20.
So my Doc. suggested I count calories too.so have done that for a week and it sure cuts down what i eat. I cut out the bacon. I am still waiting for surgery on my gall bladder(two years now).so the bad news is that I haven’t lost for the last three months.Do you have ant advise for me?
getting discouraged because I still weigh 320 lbs.
and the Dr. wants me down another 50 lbs before Nov. when we try for a surgery date.
Hi again Dr. Jay
I seem to have loged in twice sorry about that. I should tell you that I don’t excercise very much. and I do eat butter and I cut back on the eggs to one a day. Also use crystal lite andherb tea and allow one soda a day. I also cut out chewing gum.
I think I am addicted to starches as if they are in the house i can’t leave alone so don’t even buy anymore.
Big business is paying attention:
“You searched for carbs kraft cracker barrel
1 results were found
Kraft Recipes ( 0 )
Member Recipes (0)
Articles (1)
Videos (0)
Additional Results
Carbohydrates & Diabetes
Carbohydrates are the foods that raise your blood sugar. Eating carbohydrates requires planning because of their effect on blood sugar control. This is the key to managing diabetes. ”
Of course their cheese is low-carb.
Dr Jay’s Reply:
Thanks for pointing that out. Funny how they completely miss the obvious!
Dr. Jay,
There was a report on physorg.com today about an Oxford study on rats fed a high-fat diet. They were on a low-fat diet (7.5% fat) and then swittched to a high-fat (55%). In 9 days they experienced a 30% decline in aerobic capacity and cognitive decline. It was noted that they were not fed low-carb. The report claimed carbohydrate burning is much more efficient.
It strikes me as odd. My experience, for one, has been different. Second, 9 days is a short time to adjust from extreme low-fat to high-fat. Third, it makes little sense that mammals would store energy as fat primarily, but then be supposedly inefficient at burning fat for energy. Makes no sense.
Wondered what you thought of the study.
http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/rapidpdf/fj.09-139691v1.pdf
Cheers
Murray
Dr Jay’s Reply:
I’ll have to dig up the study. However, even without seeing it, I can offer some suggestions. The hypothesis that I work from these days is that we are not meant to burn glucose and that we appear to prefer glucose not because we like it but because we don’t like it. When you fill your gut with carbohydrates you create a metabolic emergency. Your body must rapidly dispose of the glucose while maintaining a normal blood sugar. Part of this involves pushing the glucose into cells so it can be burned instead of the preferred fuel which is fat. Insulin does this and also performs a fuel partitioning function which involves pushing fat out of the way so it doesn’t interfere with the burning off of the glucose. So, in these rats, if they are being fed sufficient glucose to cause this fuel partitioning to occur will have a compound problem if the diet is also high in fat. The storage of excess fat in these circumstances can be pathological with ectopic fat accumulating in unusual places. If, on the other hand, the rats were not fed carbs, they would be efficiently burning off the fat that they are eating and an increase in the fat would not be the same kind of problem.
This is my theory anyway. Although it is orthogonal to the consensus that glucose is the preferred fuel, I haven’t seen anything yet that convinces me I’m wrong.
They were “bogged” down with sugar and fat!
Pull the sugar and they will go into withdrawal for several weeks or months and still give “false positives and false negatives”.
Feed them only fat and meat and low low carb and over time they will improve immensely, just like humans.
Dr. Jay,
Thank you for your considered response. I, too, have been operating under the provisional hypothesis that fat is the preferred fuel and glucose burning is a defensive response to avoid and mitigate the damage of excessive glucose. This fits all sorts of observations, including the apparent metabolic preference to store fat for energy, as opposed to glucose (of which the maximum storage is only around 2000 calories).
What puzzles me, though, is the apparent need to have blood sugar in the range of 4 to 5 mmol/L. It seems some glucose is required–perhaps just enough to keep stored glucose/glycogen around 2000 calories and no more.
It also puzzles me at what level of carbohydrate consumption the fuel partitioning you mention would take place. Although I avoid starchy foods and added sugar, I do get carbs from berries, nuts, dairy and modest consumption of pulses. The vegetables I eat have carbs, but they are all low glycemic and it seems the carb levels in ones like leafy greens, mushrooms, celery and bell peppers would not be metabolically significant. I do not want to eat so many carbs that I fall in the “great middle” of the Grand Canyon, as Dr. Finney put it in his response to the NY Times article on this study. [See comment #403: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/fatty-foods-affect-memory-and-exercise/?apage=17#comments
My operating hypothesis has been that so long as I keep blood sugar from exceeding 6.0 mmol/L post-meal (and regularly walk after most meals), then my glucose level would stay low enough to avoid fuel partitioning. Am I plainly misguided here?
Dr Jay’s Reply:
Any increase in blood sugar will cause a surge of insulin and will lead to fuel partitioning as long as those conditions last. If you exercise, you will burn off the carbs more quickly. If you eat complex carbs that are digested and absorbed more slowly you will have more time to burn them off. I think it is in people who are eating more calories than they can burn and if a significant proportion of those are carbs where the real problems occur. They would be constantly storing fat and, because of excess calories, unable to burn it all off when the glucose and insulin levels drop between meals. When people like this also develop insulin resistance, these effects are magnified due to the increased secretion of insulin. A vicious circle of insulin resistance, increased insulin and more fuel partitioning puts them in a state of constant hunger and excess calorie (and carb) consumption leading to chronic fat storage.
There are some tissues that need glucose, hence the fact that even with no carbs in your diet, your blood sugar should remain within a normal range. The tissues that absolutely need glucose don’t have mitochondria and also don’t require insulin in order to access the glucose in the blood. It crosses their cell membranes using another transporter system. This is why glucose has to stay at certain levels in the blood so that it can be accessed by these tissues in amounts that meet their energy needs. These tissues include parts of neurons, red blood cells, the lens of the eye, sperm and a part of the kidney. Fortunately, in the absence of carbs in the diet, your liver is perfectly capable of meeting these needs. Interestingly, the kidney doesn’t completely trust the liver so it retains some capability to manufacture glucose for its own needs.
Hope that helps.
Sorry, I meant to type “Dr. Phinney.” Monday morning. ” I’ve read over abstracts of a few of his published studies. The one that came out in April (Carbohydrate restriction has a more favorable impact on the metabolic syndrome than a low fat diet. Lipids. 2009 Apr;44(4):297-309.) I assume was the one you had mentioned early was forthcoming and would indicate strongly benefits to carbohydrate restriction.
Thanks Dr. Jay, that was indeed helpful.
It seems to me that the daily glucose requirements of those organs could be roughly determined and the total would establish a baseline threshold for a safe dietary consumption level of glucose-producing carbohydrate (sugar and starch). An optimum strategy would then to ensure these carbs are in low glycemic foods and are consumed with some fat to ensure slow ingestion. In theory, this would replenish glucose as it is used by the glucose-burning organs without raising blood sugar enough to trigger insulin.
As well, I note from other research of Dr. Phinney (or at least mentioned by him) shows that above about 75% of maximum heart rate, the muscles start to burn more sugar than fat. The safe threshold, I suppose, could be adjusted to account for the daily amount of exercise above 75% maximum heart rate. One would not want to consume more than would restore glycogen to full storage capacity.
I seek this baseline threshold because there are many foods that I eitehr love or have nutritional value yet contained sugar. Mushrooms, for example, which I love, contain sugar. (We have chanterelles growing wild at our recreational property.) Nuts contain varying amounts of sugar (cashews and pistachios being higher than most). It would be reassuring to know my diet of vegetable, nuts, seeds and dairy–which contain some sugar but not a lot–does not exceed the baseline threshold. For example, I have read that the brain consumes 100-125 grams of glucose per day. If so, then I feel confident I am okay with my salad, which has vegetables that contain sugar (such as celery, bell peppers, tomatoes, mushrooms, red onion), and a modest amount of yoghurt (9 grams of sugar per 175 ml). The higher the baseline threshold, the more flexibility in planning one’s diet.
Further to your hypothesis about sugar burning being a body defence mechanism, I note that a recent study showed that the liver releases sugar into the blood in response to the detection of sugar in the mouth. On our hypothesis, the body goes into immediate red alert, anticipating a rise in blood sugar from digested sugar to trigger insulin and making room in the liver to convert incoming sugar into glycogen. Of course, the counter-hypothesis is that the body senses it is now free to use up more of its precious, preferred fuel, knowing more is coming. A problem with the counter-hypothesis is that why would the body release more fuel without any perceived need for a boost in energy (such as fight or flight response). The defnece mechanism hypothesis seems the stronger fit to the available evidence.
Dr. Jay,
I would like you throughts on a study just reprted on physorg.com. Mice again. This showed mice on low-carb diets to have much greater artery plaque buildup, despite more favourable cholesterol and lipid levels in the blood. The researchers suggest the buildup was caused by a drop in endolethial progenitor cells with the low-carb diet.
From the report, it seemed the protein ratios were really high (above 40%) in the low-carb groups. Perhaps the result is more against high protein than low-carb.
Murray
Link to the physorg.com report on the study: http://www.physorg.com/print170346116.html
Hello Dr. Jay,
We hope all is well with your family as your second baby is coming along.
Ms. Holloway–thank you for the comments on my query about lean people and carb tolerance, in the other string. This does motivate me to try to ration carbs down to a range of 100-150 g daily, half of current mainstream advice for non-diabetics.
Earlier in the posts, there was a de-emphasis on the importance of fibre. However, the eating pattern used in MBFD and those of other health low-carbers includes a lot of green and other low-carb veggies which happen to supply a lot of soluble fibre. This soluble fibre has been correlated with lower absorption of fatty acids from the digestive tract and even good effects once in circulation. In my opinion, the veggies are the important natural antidote to any harmful effects normally associated with fatty red meats and smoked meats such as colorectal cancers. All to say, I think it’s good to tout the low-carb veggies as equally important as the higher fat benefits such as satiety. It might also be one solution to the weight loss plateau faced by some low-carbers: eat a bit less fat, eat more greens.
Helen
I’m reposting this here to be sure that Dr. Jay sees it!
Dr. Jay:
My community is a test market for a new KFC “sandwich,” and a local reporter did a story in which he had his blood lipids tested, ate the sandwich, then was retested. His numbers were: HDL 50 down to 39; LDL 145 up to 155; triglycerides 135 up to 215. He used this data as “proof” that the fat (no transfat,mostly saturated) had caused these horrible changes.
The product was two breaded. fried chicken patties as the outer “holder,” (no bun) sandwiching cheese and the “Colonel’s special sauce. 590 calories, 280 from fat. No mention of carb count or what was in the sauce, or whether the chicken was processed or what kind of cheese.
I am wondering about the accuracy of blood tests immediately following a meal. I am wondering why his blood lipids appear to have reacted in a manner that is the opposite of what has been seen in longer term studies of low-fat vs low-carb. Of course, without knowing the carb count (and I expect that it was high due to the breading and suspect the sauce is full of HFCS), this is not a low-carb food and it is possible the ill-effects were due to the carbs.
I have emailed my questions to the reporter and will report back if I get the answer concerning the sauce, carbs, etc.
In the meantime, I interested in your reaction to this.
The newspaper story cited this statistic: Every point your HDL drops, your heart disease risk goes up 10%. And implied fully that dietary fat is the culprit.
Peggy in Omaha
The people of European ancestry don’t want to view everything they have done from the beginning as wrong. Dead wrong. — So they won’t view and grasp and comprehend the source of this insanity, the stimulants, alcohol, caffeine, sugar and hybrid carbohydrates.
The native people have been forced to assimilate to these European ways and mentality and are also unable to grasp the complexity of this issue.
It is too painful.
We are caught in the middle.
The European ancestry people, ie; white people, are not going to accept these realities anytime soon, if ever.
The Queens way is forever.
Or is it!
They are totally blocked and mindset.
The Indigenous on the other hand, still have a chance if they can face the atrociousness and complexity of this reality, which none of us wants to do.
All tribes, of all nations and all races need to deal with this.
The American Indian can lead the way.
Prior to this, nobody has answered the reason for all of this insanity.
I believe the single biggest mistake people make when they watch this Documentary is that they think, yes this is good for these obese and diabetic and potentially diabetic people and particularly native populations which seem to have a propensity to these illnesses.
When in fact this is for everybody, be they fat or skinny or average or black or white or brown or rich or poor or young or old.
In perfect health or failing health.
Every single person on this planet earth.
It’s health and sanity were talking here.
Our acquired way of eating, which is killing and destroying everyone of us, or traditional eating which is the exact opposite.
Pure health and longevity.
They just don’t understand and can’t believe it.
? ??????, ??? ?? ??????????. ???? ???????? ???? ???????….
???????? ?? ???????? ……
Buy:Viagra Soft Tabs.Cialis.Viagra.Viagra Professional.Viagra Super Force.Viagra Super Active+.Maxaman.Levitra.Cialis Soft Tabs.Propecia.Cialis Super Active+.Zithromax.Soma.Cialis Professional.VPXL.Super Active ED Pack.Tramadol….